Literature DB >> 7931451

An analysis of the effect of venous resistance on the performance of gravity-fed intravenous infusion systems.

D B Goodie1, J H Philip.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to assess the effect of venous resistance in a clinically relevant range on flow rates through intravenous (i.v.) cannulae.
METHODS: Since resistances in series are additive, the sum of the resistance of the i.v. cannula and the vein equates to the total resistance to flow. Using resistance data from earlier work, the total resistance for various combinations of cannula and vein size was calculated, allowing a prediction to be made of the comparative flow rates between these combinations for a given driving pressure. Next, the clinical situation was simulated by measuring flow rates through i.v. cannulae connected in series to a variety of infusion devices with resistances known to be within the range of clinically relevant venous resistance.
RESULTS: The effect of venous resistance was greatest on large-bore cannulae, with significant reductions in flow occurring when even low levels of venous resistance were added. Throughout much of the range of venous resistances encountered clinically, total flows through two small-gauge cannulae exceeded that through a single large-gauge cannula.
CONCLUSION: To achieve maximum benefit from a large-bore cannula, a suitably large vein must be chosen. Further, where venous access is difficult and high flow potential from an infusion system is required, two separate infusions through small cannulae may be a preferable option to a single large bore.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7931451     DOI: 10.1007/bf02899506

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit        ISSN: 0748-1977


  19 in total

1.  Prediction of flow capability in intravenous infusion systems: implications for fluid resuscitation.

Authors:  B K Philip; J H Philip
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1990-04

2.  Technical limitations in the rapid infusion of intravenous fluids.

Authors:  M I Aeder; J P Crowe; R S Rhodes; J M Shuck; W M Wolf
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 5.721

3.  Flow through intravenous cannulae.

Authors:  I G Kestin
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 6.955

4.  Impairment of flow in routine gravity-fed intravenous infusions to surgical patients.

Authors:  E W Clarke; J P Jamison; J B Quartey-Papafio
Journal:  Clin Sci (Lond)       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 6.124

5.  Characterization of flow in intravenous infusion systems.

Authors:  B K Philip; J H Philip
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 4.538

6.  Comparison of flow rates for standard and large-bore blood tubing.

Authors:  K V Iserson; A K Reeter; E Criss
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1985-08

7.  Risk factors for infusion-related phlebitis with small peripheral venous catheters. A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  D G Maki; M Ringer
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1991-05-15       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Disturbances of blood-flow velocity in the dorsal veins of the hand after vein cannulation and cannula fixation in the anaesthetised patient.

Authors:  P Nitescu; N Larsson; E Eriksson; I Frid; R Volkmann; H Haljamäe; L E Linder; I Curelaru
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 2.105

9.  Central and peripheral catheter flow rates in "pediatric" dogs.

Authors:  D Hodge; C Delgado-Paredes; G Fleisher
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 5.721

Review 10.  Model for the physics and physiology of fluid administration.

Authors:  J H Philip
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1989-04
View more
  1 in total

1.  Intravenous infusion: understanding the technical side can improve clinical performance.

Authors:  D Elad
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1994-07
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.