Literature DB >> 7931043

Costs over time in conventional treatment of acute myeloid leukaemia. A study exploring changes in treatment strategies over two decades.

A M Stalfelt1, H Brodin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim was to analyse the consumption of different items in conventional treatment of acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) and their cost, in order to evaluate the economic consequences of new treatment strategies.
DESIGN: Data on items of treatment were gathered retrospectively from case notes, including amount and date. Prices were gathered from price lists made up for internal billing/accounting.
SETTING: The patients were all treated in a hospital with excellent treatment and service facilities.
SUBJECTS: Seventy-three AML patients treated from 1973 to 1980, all since deceased, were compared with 54 patients treated from 1981 to 1988, of whom 14 were alive at the end of the observation period.
INTERVENTIONS: The patients were treated according to randomized treatment protocols to achieve complete remission. Maintenance treatment or consolidation courses were given. In relapse, new induction treatment was given. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Complete remission and survival were registered. The costs were divided into basic hospital costs and patient-specific costs.
RESULTS: The mean total treatment cost for an AML patient in the 1970s was 211,138 SEK, and in 1980s 356,911 SEK. (UK 1 pound = 10.57 SEK, US$1 = 5.91 SEK 1990). All treatment costs increased between the periods: hospital costs by 20%, and patient-specific costs by 186%. Antibiotics, cytostatics and outpatient department costs had increased the most. The mean survival time almost doubled, and in the 1980s group there were several long-term survivors.
CONCLUSIONS: The costs for AML treatment increased considerably from the 1970s to the 1980s. The effectiveness of these treatments increased as well, resulting in increased rate and duration of survival, and several patients were long-term survivors. It was not possible to identify the cost consequences of separate new technologies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7931043     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.1994.tb00816.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Intern Med        ISSN: 0954-6820            Impact factor:   8.989


  5 in total

1.  Induction-related cost of patients with acute myeloid leukaemia in France.

Authors:  Virginie Nerich; Bruno Lioure; Maryline Rave; Christian Recher; Arnaud Pigneux; Brigitte Witz; Martine Escoffre-Barbe; Marie-Pierre Moles; Eric Jourdan; Jean Yves Cahn; Marie-Christine Woronoff-Lemsi
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm       Date:  2011-01-28

Review 2.  Pharmacoeconomic considerations in treating patients with acute leukaemia.

Authors:  V Jønsson; M M Hansen; P Ljungman; S Kaasa
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Resource Utilization and Safety of Outpatient Management Following Intensive Induction or Salvage Chemotherapy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia or Myelodysplastic Syndrome: A Nonrandomized Clinical Comparative Analysis.

Authors:  Jennifer E Vaughn; Megan Othus; Morgan A Powell; Kelda M Gardner; Donelle L Rizzuto; Paul C Hendrie; Pamela S Becker; Paul S Pottinger; Elihu H Estey; Roland B Walter
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 31.777

4.  The Association of Hematological Malignancy and End-of-Life Expenditure in Cancer Decedents: A Population-Based Study in an Asian Country.

Authors:  Yeh-Ting Hung; Chih-Yuan Huang; Chun-Ming Chang; Ching-Chih Lee
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.889

5.  Acute myeloid leukaemia: challenges and real world data from India.

Authors:  Chepsy Philip; Biju George; Abhijeet Ganapule; Anu Korula; Punit Jain; Ansu Abu Alex; Kavitha M Lakshmi; Usha Sitaram; Fouzia N Abubacker; Aby Abraham; Auro Viswabandya; Vivi M Srivastava; Alok Srivastava; Poonkuzhali Balasubramanian; Vikram Mathews
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 6.998

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.