Jennifer E Vaughn1, Megan Othus2, Morgan A Powell3, Kelda M Gardner4, Donelle L Rizzuto4, Paul C Hendrie5, Pamela S Becker6, Paul S Pottinger7, Elihu H Estey6, Roland B Walter8. 1. Hematology/Oncology Fellowship Program, University of Washington, Seattle2Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington3now with Blue Ridge Cancer Care, Department of Medicine, Virginia Tech Carilion School of Med. 2. Public Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington. 3. Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington. 4. Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, Washington. 5. Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle. 6. Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington6Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle. 7. Division of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle. 8. Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington6Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle8Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle.
Abstract
IMPORTANCE: Adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) typically remain hospitalized after induction or salvage chemotherapy until blood cell count recovery, with resulting prolonged inpatient stays being a primary driver of health care costs. Pilot studies suggest that outpatient management following chemotherapy might be safe and could reduce costs for these patients. OBJECTIVE: To compare safety, resource utilization, infections, and costs between adults discharged early following AML or MDS induction or salvage chemotherapy and inpatient controls. DESIGN: Nonrandomized, phase 2, single-center study conducted at the University of Washington Medical Center. Over a 43-month period (January 1, 2011, through July 31, 2014), 178 adults receiving intensive AML or MDS chemotherapy were enrolled. After completion of chemotherapy, 107 patients met predesignated medical and logistical criteria for early discharge, while 29 met medical criteria only and served as inpatient controls. INTERVENTIONS: Early-discharge patients were released from the hospital at the completion of chemotherapy, and supportive care was provided in the outpatient setting until blood cell count recovery (median, 21 days; range, 2-45 days). Controls received inpatient supportive care (median, 16 days; range, 3-42 days). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: We analyzed differences in early mortality, resource utilization including intensive care unit (ICU) days, transfusions per study day, and use of intravenous (IV) antibiotics per study day), numbers of infections, and total and inpatient charges per study day among early-discharge patients vs controls. RESULTS: Four of the 107 early-discharge patients and none of the 29 control patients died within 30 days of enrollment (P=.58). Nine early-discharge patients (8%) but no controls required ICU-level care (P=.20). No differences were noted in the median daily number of transfused red blood cell units (0.27 vs 0.29; P=.55) or number of transfused platelet units (0.26 vs 0.29; P=.31). Early-discharge patients had more positive blood cultures (37 [35%] vs 4 [14%]; P=.04) but required fewer IV antibiotic days per study day (0.48 vs 0.71; P=.01). Overall, daily charges among early-discharge patients were significantly lower than for inpatients (median, $3840 vs $5852; P<.001) despite increased charges per inpatient day when readmitted (median, $7405 vs $5852; P<.001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Early discharge following intensive AML or MDS chemotherapy can reduce costs and use of IV antibiotics, but attention should be paid to complications that may occur in the outpatient setting.
IMPORTANCE: Adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) typically remain hospitalized after induction or salvage chemotherapy until blood cell count recovery, with resulting prolonged inpatient stays being a primary driver of health care costs. Pilot studies suggest that outpatient management following chemotherapy might be safe and could reduce costs for these patients. OBJECTIVE: To compare safety, resource utilization, infections, and costs between adults discharged early following AML or MDS induction or salvage chemotherapy and inpatient controls. DESIGN: Nonrandomized, phase 2, single-center study conducted at the University of Washington Medical Center. Over a 43-month period (January 1, 2011, through July 31, 2014), 178 adults receiving intensive AML or MDS chemotherapy were enrolled. After completion of chemotherapy, 107 patients met predesignated medical and logistical criteria for early discharge, while 29 met medical criteria only and served as inpatient controls. INTERVENTIONS: Early-discharge patients were released from the hospital at the completion of chemotherapy, and supportive care was provided in the outpatient setting until blood cell count recovery (median, 21 days; range, 2-45 days). Controls received inpatient supportive care (median, 16 days; range, 3-42 days). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: We analyzed differences in early mortality, resource utilization including intensive care unit (ICU) days, transfusions per study day, and use of intravenous (IV) antibiotics per study day), numbers of infections, and total and inpatient charges per study day among early-discharge patients vs controls. RESULTS: Four of the 107 early-discharge patients and none of the 29 control patients died within 30 days of enrollment (P=.58). Nine early-discharge patients (8%) but no controls required ICU-level care (P=.20). No differences were noted in the median daily number of transfused red blood cell units (0.27 vs 0.29; P=.55) or number of transfused platelet units (0.26 vs 0.29; P=.31). Early-discharge patients had more positive blood cultures (37 [35%] vs 4 [14%]; P=.04) but required fewer IV antibiotic days per study day (0.48 vs 0.71; P=.01). Overall, daily charges among early-discharge patients were significantly lower than for inpatients (median, $3840 vs $5852; P<.001) despite increased charges per inpatient day when readmitted (median, $7405 vs $5852; P<.001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Early discharge following intensive AML or MDS chemotherapy can reduce costs and use of IV antibiotics, but attention should be paid to complications that may occur in the outpatient setting.
Authors: P Stiff; P Mumby; L Miler; T Rodriguez; M Parthswarthy; K Kiley; N Porter; R Batiste; S Wojtowitz; S Lichtenstein; M Fox-Geiman; A Toor Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant Date: 2006-10-23 Impact factor: 5.483
Authors: B R Meisenberg; W E Miller; R McMillan; M Callaghan; C Sloan; T Brehm; M P Kosty; J Kroener; R Longmire; A Saven; L D Piro Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1997-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Cesar Homero Gutiérrez-Aguirre; Guillermo Ruiz-Argüelles; Olga Graciela Cantú-Rodríguez; Oscar González-Llano; José Carlos Jaime-Pérez; Fernando García-Rodríguez; Avril López-Otero; José Luis Herrera-Garza; David Gómez-Almaguer Journal: Ann Hematol Date: 2010-05-21 Impact factor: 3.673
Authors: S McDiarmid; B Hutton; H Atkins; I Bence-Bruckler; C Bredeson; E Sabri; L Huebsch Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant Date: 2009-11-30 Impact factor: 5.483
Authors: S R Solomon; R H Matthews; A M Barreras; A Bashey; K L Manion; K McNatt; D Speckhart; D G Connaghan; L E Morris; H K Holland Journal: Bone Marrow Transplant Date: 2009-09-21 Impact factor: 5.483
Authors: M L Savoie; T J Nevil; K W Song; D L Forrest; D E Hogge; S H Nantel; J D Shepherd; C A Smith; H J Sutherland; C L Toze; J C Lavoie Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2006-02-23 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: T Y Halim; K W Song; M J Barnett; D L Forrest; D E Hogge; S H Nantel; T J Nevill; J D Shepherd; C A Smith; H J Sutherland; C L Toze; J C Lavoie Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2007-04-17 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Mary-Elizabeth M Percival; Ryan C Lynch; Anna B Halpern; Mazyar Shadman; Ryan D Cassaday; Chaitra Ujjani; Andrei Shustov; Yolanda D Tseng; Catherine Liu; Steven Pergam; Edward N Libby; Bart L Scott; Stephen D Smith; Damian J Green; Ajay K Gopal; Andrew J Cowan Journal: JCO Oncol Pract Date: 2020-05-05
Authors: Melissa K Accordino; Jason D Wright; Sowmya Vasan; Alfred I Neugut; Grace C Hillyer; Dawn L Hershman Journal: Cancer Invest Date: 2017-02-06 Impact factor: 2.176
Authors: Frances Linzee Mabrey; Kelda M Gardner; Kathleen Shannon Dorcy; Andrea Perdue; Heather A Smith; Alicyn M Davis; Cody Hammer; Donelle Rizzuto; Sunny Jones; Kim Quach; Bart L Scott; Paul C Hendrie; Mary-Elizabeth M Percival; Roland B Walter; Frederick R Appelbaum; Elihu H Estey; Pamela S Becker Journal: Blood Adv Date: 2020-02-25
Authors: Ignacio Gómez-Centurión; Gillen Oarbeascoa; María Carmen García; María Carmen López Fresneña; María Josefa Martínez Carreño; Vicente Escudero Vilaplana; Eva González-Haba; Rebeca Bailén; Nieves Dorado; Luis Miguel Juárez; Gabriela Rodríguez Macías; Patricia Font López; Cristina Encinas; Mariana Bastos-Oreiro; Javier Anguita; María Sanjurjo; José Luis Díez-Martin; Mi Kwon Journal: Int J Hematol Date: 2021-09-22 Impact factor: 2.490