Literature DB >> 10351190

Pharmacoeconomic considerations in treating patients with acute leukaemia.

V Jønsson1, M M Hansen, P Ljungman, S Kaasa.   

Abstract

Whereas individual cost-effectiveness analyses of new agents for acute leukaemia should be performed in target populations, any meaningful pharmacoeconomic evaluation of treatment options for this condition should include the many types of costs and outcomes in unselected, representative groups of patients. Both direct costs (e.g. costs for medication and hospitalisation) and indirect costs (e.g. lost productivity costs and reduced quality of life) are important parameters to assess, as are the costs of chronic adverse effects, research and development costs for new agents, and costs of procedure-related deaths. Complete remission, cure and survival are the 'success' response criteria for acute leukaemia treatments, in addition to prolonged life with acceptable quality of life for patients with incurable acute leukaemia. Death is 'failure', caused either by resistant disease (relapse and progressive disease) inspite of optimal chemotherapy or, sometimes, by insufficient treatment. All of these parameters should be taken into account when a pharmacoeconomic evaluation is performed (either for administrative or scientific purposes) in order to ensure a comprehensive and reliable background for the evaluation in question. Treatment of acute leukaemia is expensive with a total cost of about $US3000 per patient per day during the induction. Although 80% of children with acute leukaemia are cured, only less than 50% of adults are cured. Thus, a great cost is associated with death during treatment and only optimal medical treatment with full-scale combination chemotherapy and full supportive treatment can keep the number of deaths to a minimum.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10351190     DOI: 10.2165/00019053-199915020-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  37 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness guidelines for reimbursement of pharmaceuticals: is economic evaluation ready for its enhanced status?

Authors:  M Drummond
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 2.  Planned progressive antimicrobial therapy in neutropenic patients.

Authors:  C Viscoli; E Castagnola
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 6.998

Review 3.  Knowing just how effective is treatment: implications for care of cancer patients.

Authors:  C J Williams
Journal:  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol)       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.126

4.  Randomized comparison of DAT versus ADE as induction chemotherapy in children and younger adults with acute myeloid leukemia. Results of the Medical Research Council's 10th AML trial (MRC AML10). Adult and Childhood Leukaemia Working Parties of the Medical Research Council.

Authors:  I M Hann; R F Stevens; A H Goldstone; J K Rees; K Wheatley; R G Gray; A K Burnett
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1997-04-01       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  The cost-effectiveness of idarubicin/cytosine arabinoside versus daunorubicin/cytosine arabinoside in the treatment of adults with acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  S Pashko; J Jacobs; J Santorsa
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  1991 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.393

6.  Double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of daunorubicin and cytarabine with or without recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia: economic evaluation with attention to inpatient and outpatient resource utilization.

Authors:  D A Freund; R S Dittus
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  1995

7.  Improved outcome in adult B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  D Hoelzer; W D Ludwig; E Thiel; W Gassmann; H Löffler; C Fonatsch; H Rieder; G Heil; B Heinze; R Arnold; D Hossfeld; T Büchner; P Koch; M Freund; W Hiddemann; G Maschmeyer; A Heyll; C Aul; T Faak; R Kuse; T H Ittel; M Gramatzki; H Diedrich; K Kolbe; H G Fuhr; K Fischer; C Schadeck-Gressel; A Weiss; I Strohscheer; B Metzner; U Fabry; N Gökbuget; B Völkers; D Messerer; K Uberla
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1996-01-15       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor associated with induction treatment of acute myelogenous leukemia: a randomized trial by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Leukemia Cooperative Group.

Authors:  R Zittoun; S Suciu; F Mandelli; T de Witte; J Thaler; P Stryckmans; M Hayat; M Peetermans; M Cadiou; G Solbu; M C Petti; R Willemze
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Test/retest study of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality-of-Life Questionnaire.

Authors:  M J Hjermstad; S D Fossa; K Bjordal; S Kaasa
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Long-term follow-up of adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in first remission treated with chemotherapy or bone marrow transplantation. The Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Working Committee.

Authors:  M J Zhang; D Hoelzer; M M Horowitz; R P Gale; D Messerer; J P Klein; H Löffler; K A Sobocinski; E Thiel; D J Weisdorf
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1995-09-15       Impact factor: 25.391

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.