Literature DB >> 79303

[Anterior and posterior medullary analgesic stimulation, using a percutaneous implantation technic].

Y Lazorthes, J C Verdie, L Arbus.   

Abstract

The technique of percutaneous implantation of a pain-relieving stimulator reduces the surgical procedure considerably. This advantage is, however, lessened by the absence of precision in placing epidural electrodes, and by the risk of their later displacement leading to inadequate stimulation. To reduce this disadvantage the authors suggest a technique that is a modification of the classical open procedure: it is particularly suitable for implantation at the cervico-dorsal junction. In 12 patients treated by percutaneous implantation, 5 received, from epidural electrodes, an anterior medullary electrical stimulation which caused analgesia without paraesthesiae in the painful ares. The results, however, do not justify a conclusion that anterior medullary stimulation is better than posterior column stimulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 79303     DOI: 10.1007/BF01774751

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)        ISSN: 0001-6268            Impact factor:   2.216


  14 in total

1.  Percutaneous trial of stimulation for patient selection for implantable stimulating devices.

Authors:  D L Erickson
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1975-10       Impact factor: 5.115

2.  Electrical stimulation of the ventral and dorsal columns of the spinal cord for relief of chronic intractable pain: preliminary report.

Authors:  R Hoppenstein
Journal:  Surg Neurol       Date:  1975-07

3.  Stimulation of the posterior columns of the spinal cord for pain control: indications, technique, and results.

Authors:  W H Sweet; J G Wepsic
Journal:  Clin Neurosurg       Date:  1974

4.  Analgesia produced by brain stimulation: evidence of a prolonged onset period.

Authors:  R Melzack; D F Melinkoff
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 5.330

5.  Dorsal column stimulation. Its effect on the somatosensory evoked response.

Authors:  R D Blair; R G Lee; G Vanderlinden
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  1975-12

6.  [Role of transcutaneous electric stimulation in indication for implantation of an analgesic stimulator].

Authors:  Y Lazorthes; J C Verdie; J Lagarrigue; J S Rohner; G Farnarier; D Planche; R Sedan
Journal:  Neurochirurgie       Date:  1975 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.553

7.  Identification of two related pentapeptides from the brain with potent opiate agonist activity.

Authors:  J Hughes; T W Smith; H W Kosterlitz; L A Fothergill; B A Morgan; H R Morris
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1975-12-18       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  A comparison between anterior and posterior spinal implant systems.

Authors:  S J Larson; A Sances; J F Cusick; G A Meyer; T Swiontek
Journal:  Surg Neurol       Date:  1975-07

9.  Pain perception: modification of threshold of intolerance and cortical potentials by cutaneous stimulation.

Authors:  R Satran; M N Goldstein
Journal:  Science       Date:  1973-06-15       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Pain reduction by focal electrical stimulation of the brain: an anatomical and behavioral analysis.

Authors:  D J Mayer; J C Liebeskind
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1974-03-15       Impact factor: 3.252

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Spinal cord stimulation: an update.

Authors:  Steven Falowski; Amanda Celii; Ashwini Sharan
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 7.620

2.  On newborn cuddliness.

Authors:  M Papini; M G Martinetti; S Guerri; M Bigozzi; P Costa
Journal:  Ital J Neurol Sci       Date:  1986-04
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.