Literature DB >> 1080515

Percutaneous trial of stimulation for patient selection for implantable stimulating devices.

D L Erickson.   

Abstract

The author describes a flexible electrode which can be inserted percutaneously for a period of several days in candidates for an implantable electrical stimulating device for pain relief. This allows the patient a trial of stimulation which closely mimics that of the intended implantable system. If this trial does not give adequate pain relief in a variety of situations, the patient is not considered to be a suitable candidate for an implantable device. The trial of stimulation in no way obviates the need for careful scrutiny of the social and psychological factors accompanying chronic pain problems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1975        PMID: 1080515     DOI: 10.3171/jns.1975.43.4.0440

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  8 in total

1.  Dorsal column stimulation (DCS) in chronic pain: report of 31 cases.

Authors:  B Mittal; D G Thomas; P Walton; I Calder
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  [Anterior and posterior medullary analgesic stimulation, using a percutaneous implantation technic].

Authors:  Y Lazorthes; J C Verdie; L Arbus
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 2.216

3.  Spinal cord stimulation for failed back surgery syndrome.

Authors:  Jean-Christophe Leveque; Alan T Villavicencio; Ketan R Bulsara; Linda Rubin; John P Gorecki
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2001-01

4.  Research design considerations for randomized controlled trials of spinal cord stimulation for pain: Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials/Institute of Neuromodulation/International Neuromodulation Society recommendations.

Authors:  Nathaniel Katz; Robert H Dworkin; Richard North; Simon Thomson; Sam Eldabe; Salim M Hayek; Brian H Kopell; John Markman; Ali Rezai; Rod S Taylor; Dennis C Turk; Eric Buchser; Howard Fields; Gregory Fiore; McKenzie Ferguson; Jennifer Gewandter; Chris Hilker; Roshini Jain; Angela Leitner; John Loeser; Ewan McNicol; Turo Nurmikko; Jane Shipley; Rahul Singh; Andrea Trescot; Robert van Dongen; Lalit Venkatesan
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 6.961

5.  Redefining Spinal Cord Stimulation "Trials": A Randomized Controlled Trial Using Single-Stage Wireless Permanent Implantable Devices.

Authors:  Richard B North; Aaron Calodney; Robert Bolash; Konstantin V Slavin; Michael Creamer; Richard Rauck; Payam Vahedifar; Ira Fox; Cuneyt Özaktay; Sunil Panchal; Niek Vanquathem
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2019-06-03

6.  Screening trials of spinal cord stimulation for neuropathic pain in England-A budget impact analysis.

Authors:  Rui V Duarte; Rachel Houten; Sarah Nevitt; Morag Brookes; Jill Bell; Jenny Earle; Ashish Gulve; Simon Thomson; Ganesan Baranidharan; Richard B North; Rod S Taylor; Sam Eldabe
Journal:  Front Pain Res (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-09-06

7.  Postoperative Infections Associated With Prolonged Spinal Cord Stimulation Trial Duration (PROMISE RCT).

Authors:  Richard North; Mehul J Desai; Johan Vangeneugden; Christian Raftopoulos; Tony Van Havenbergh; Marc Deruytter; Jean-Michel Remacle; Jane Shipley; Ye Tan; Mary Jo Johnson; Carine Van den Abeele; Philippe Rigoard
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2020-04-08

8.  Cost-Effectiveness Model Shows Superiority of Wireless Spinal Cord Stimulation Implantation Without a Separate Trial.

Authors:  Richard B North; Harish S Parihar; Shawn D Spencer; Arthur F Spalding; Jane Shipley
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2020-02-17
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.