Literature DB >> 7929897

Information processing within the motor cortex. I. Responses of morphologically identified motor cortical cells to stimulation of the somatosensory cortex.

T Kaneko1, M A Caria, H Asanuma.   

Abstract

Inputs from the somatosensory cortex to the motor cortex have been proposed to function in learning of motor skills. In an attempt to analyze how these somatosensory inputs were processed in the motor cortex, neurons in the superficial layer of the cat motor cortex were classified into three groups on the basis of synaptic responses elicited by intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) of area 2. ICMS was delivered through seven electrodes implanted in area 2. When ICMS through one of the seven sites produced a response that was greater than 50% of the response produced by stimulating the seven sites at a time, the site was called a "dominant" site. Type I cells were those that had a dominant stimulation site and showed a constant response latency when examined by a double shock test. Type II cells were those that had a dominant site but displayed a variable latency. Type III cells had no dominant site and showed a variable latency. Latency of type I responses was 1.2-2.6 milliseconds, which was much shorter than that of type II and type III responses. Seventy-nine neurons in layers II/III of the motor cortex, which responded to ICMS in area 2, were stained by intracellular injection of biocytin. From the presence of an apical dendrite and rich spines on the dendrites, 23 type I, 21 type II, and 15 type III cells were classified as pyramidal cells. Type II pyramidal cells were located more superficially than type I and type III pyramidal cells. On the basis of the absence or sparseness of dendritic spines, three type I and four type II cells in layers II/III were classified as nonpyramidal cells. These cells consisted of five small multipolar cells in layer II and a large multipolar cell and a small bitufted cell in layer III. The remaining 11 cells were not classified because of insufficient staining. Since type I and type II cells are considered to represent monosynaptic and polysynaptic responses to stimulation of area 2, respectively, information flow from type I cells to more superficially located type II cells is presumed in layers II/III of the motor cortex. Type III responses suggest the presence of a convergent flow of impulses inside of and/or between areas 2 and 4.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7929897     DOI: 10.1002/cne.903450202

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Neurol        ISSN: 0021-9967            Impact factor:   3.215


  28 in total

1.  Long-term increases in neuronal activity in the motor cortex evoked by simultaneous stimulation of the thalamus and somatosensory cortex in cats.

Authors:  A Kimura; R Grigor'yan; H Asanuma
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug

2.  Modulation of intracortical neuronal circuits in human hand motor area by digit stimulation.

Authors:  Masahito Kobayashi; Jane Ng; Hugo Théoret; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-01-11       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Outlasting corticomotor excitability changes induced by 25 Hz whole-hand mechanical stimulation.

Authors:  Monica Christova; Dietmar Rafolt; Stefan Golaszewski; Eugen Gallasch
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Mechanisms of cortical reorganization in lower-limb amputees.

Authors:  R Chen; B Corwell; Z Yaseen; M Hallett; L G Cohen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-05-01       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Phase I Safety Trial: Extended Daily Peripheral Sensory Stimulation Using a Wrist-Worn Vibrator in Stroke Survivors.

Authors:  Na Jin Seo; Leah R Enders; Andrew Fortune; Shannon Cain; Amanda A Vatinno; Eli Schuster; Viswanathan Ramakrishnan; Wuwei Feng
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 6.829

6.  TheraBracelet Stimulation During Task-Practice Therapy to Improve Upper Extremity Function After Stroke: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Study.

Authors:  Na J Seo; Michelle L Woodbury; Leonardo Bonilha; Viswanathan Ramakrishnan; Steven A Kautz; Ryan J Downey; Blair H S Dellenbach; Abigail W Lauer; Caroline M Roark; Lauren E Landers; Sarah K Phillips; Amanda A Vatinno
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2019-03-01

7.  Modulation of human corticomotor excitability by somatosensory input.

Authors:  Alain Kaelin-Lang; Andreas R Luft; Lumy Sawaki; Aaron H Burstein; Young H Sohn; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-04-15       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Use of imperceptible wrist vibration to modulate sensorimotor cortical activity.

Authors:  Na Jin Seo; Kishor Lakshminarayanan; Abigail W Lauer; Viswanathan Ramakrishnan; Brian D Schmit; Colleen A Hanlon; Mark S George; Leonardo Bonilha; Ryan J Downey; Will DeVries; Tibor Nagy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Intracortical cartography in an agranular area.

Authors:  Gordon M G Shepherd
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Sensorimotor cortex injury effects on recovery of contralesional dexterous movements in Macaca mulatta.

Authors:  Warren G Darling; Marc A Pizzimenti; Diane L Rotella; Stephanie M Hynes; Jizhi Ge; Kimberly Stilwell-Morecraft; Robert J Morecraft
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 5.330

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.