Literature DB >> 31444692

Phase I Safety Trial: Extended Daily Peripheral Sensory Stimulation Using a Wrist-Worn Vibrator in Stroke Survivors.

Na Jin Seo1, Leah R Enders2, Andrew Fortune3, Shannon Cain4, Amanda A Vatinno3, Eli Schuster5, Viswanathan Ramakrishnan6, Wuwei Feng3,7.   

Abstract

Peripheral sensory stimulation augments post-stroke upper extremity rehabilitation outcomes. Most sensory stimulations interfere with natural hand tasks and the stimulation duration is limited. We developed TheraBracelet, low-level random-frequency vibration applied via a wristwatch, to enable stimulation during hand tasks and potentially extend stimulation durations. To determine safety of prolonged exposure to TheraBracelet. Single-site double-blind crossover randomized controlled trial. Chronic stroke survivors were instructed to wear a device on the affected wrist for > 8 h/day everyday for 2 months while coming to the laboratory weekly for evaluations, with a 2-week break between each month. The device applied vibration at 60% and 1% of the sensory threshold for the real and sham month, respectively. The order of the real and sham months was randomized/balanced. Adverse events (AEs) were assessed weekly, including worsening of hand sensation, dexterity, grip strength, pain, or spasticity and occurrence of skin irritation or swelling. Device-related AE rates were compared between the real and sham month. Twenty-five participants completed the study. Six participants (24%) experienced mild AEs involving worsened sensory scores that may be related to the intervention with reasonable possibility. Two experienced them in the real stimulation month only, 3 in the sham month only, and 1 in both months. Therefore, less participants experienced device-related AEs in the real than sham month. Daily stimulation using the device for a month is safe for chronic stroke survivors. Future studies examining the efficacy of pairing TheraBracelet with therapy for increasing neurorehabilitation outcomes are a logical next step. Trial registration: NCT03318341.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Paresis; Patient safety; Physical stimulation; Stroke rehabilitation; Subliminal stimulation; Upper extremity

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31444692      PMCID: PMC7035973          DOI: 10.1007/s12975-019-00724-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Stroke Res        ISSN: 1868-4483            Impact factor:   6.829


  41 in total

1.  The effect of long-term TENS on persistent neuroplastic changes in the human cerebral cortex.

Authors:  Raf L J Meesen; Koen Cuypers; John C Rothwell; Stephan P Swinnen; Oron Levin
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Noise-enhanced tactile sensation.

Authors:  J J Collins; T T Imhoff; P Grigg
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-10-31       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Repetitive Peripheral Sensory Stimulation and Upper Limb Performance in Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Adriana Bastos Conforto; Sarah Monteiro Dos Anjos; Wanderley Marques Bernardo; Arnaldo Alves da Silva; Juliana Conti; André G Machado; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 3.919

4.  Properties of cutaneous mechanoreceptors in the human hand related to touch sensation.

Authors:  A B Vallbo; R S Johansson
Journal:  Hum Neurobiol       Date:  1984

5.  Modulation of human corticomotor excitability by somatosensory input.

Authors:  Alain Kaelin-Lang; Andreas R Luft; Lumy Sawaki; Aaron H Burstein; Young H Sohn; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-04-15       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Use of imperceptible wrist vibration to modulate sensorimotor cortical activity.

Authors:  Na Jin Seo; Kishor Lakshminarayanan; Abigail W Lauer; Viswanathan Ramakrishnan; Brian D Schmit; Colleen A Hanlon; Mark S George; Leonardo Bonilha; Ryan J Downey; Will DeVries; Tibor Nagy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Test-retest reproducibility and smallest real difference of 5 hand function tests in patients with stroke.

Authors:  Hui-Mei Chen; Christine C Chen; I-Ping Hsueh; Sheau-Ling Huang; Ching-Lin Hsieh
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 3.919

8.  Intention-to-treat concept: A review.

Authors:  Sandeep K Gupta
Journal:  Perspect Clin Res       Date:  2011-07

9.  Remote vibrotactile noise improves light touch sensation in stroke survivors' fingertips via stochastic resonance.

Authors:  Leah R Enders; Pilwon Hur; Michelle J Johnson; Na Jin Seo
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 4.262

10.  Effect of remote sensory noise on hand function post stroke.

Authors:  Na Jin Seo; Marcella Lyn Kosmopoulos; Leah R Enders; Pilwon Hur
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  2 in total

1.  Using Subthreshold Vibratory Stimulation During Poststroke Rehabilitation Therapy: A Case Series.

Authors:  Amanda A Vatinno; Lucion Hall; Hannah Cox; Alison Fluharty; Catilyn Taylor; Alexandra Wease; Allison Davis; Shannon Cain; Viswanathan Ramakrishnan; Michelle Woodbury; Na Jin Seo
Journal:  OTJR (Thorofare N J)       Date:  2021-09-09

2.  Concomitant sensory stimulation during therapy to enhance hand functional recovery post stroke.

Authors:  Na Jin Seo; Viswanathan Ramakrishnan; Michelle L Woodbury; Leonardo Bonilha; Christian Finetto; Christian Schranz; Gabrielle Scronce; Kristen Coupland; Jenna Blaschke; Adam Baker; Keith Howard; Caitlyn Meinzer; Craig A Velozo; Robert J Adams
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 2.279

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.