Literature DB >> 7924481

Efficacy of a new full face mask for noninvasive positive pressure ventilation.

G J Criner1, J M Travaline, K J Brennan, D T Kreimer.   

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) improves gas exchange in acute and chronic respiratory failure. However, some patients are unable to tolerate NPPV due to air leaks around the mask, facial discomfort, and claustrophobia. A new mask that covers the entire face (Total, Respironics, Monroeville, Pa), attempts to overcome these obstacles. We studied the efficacy of NPPV via the Total face mask (TFM) in nine patients with chronic respiratory failure. In three patients, respiratory failure was due to chronic obstructive lung disease, and in six patients, it was secondary to restrictive disorders. None of the patients were previously able to tolerate NPPV via nasal (N) or nasal-oral (NO) masks. At baseline, all patients had impaired gas exchange with low PaO2/FIO2 (241 +/- 14), elevated PaCO2 (79 +/- 5 mm Hg), and poor functional status (1.89 +/- 1.45, on a scale of 1 to 7). After NPPV in the hospital for 7.1 +/- 1.5 h per night for 22 +/- 26 days, the PaCO2 fell to 59 +/- 3 mm Hg, and the PaO2/FIO2 rose to 304 +/- 27. Following nocturnal NPPV via the TFM for 6.7 +/- 1.5 h a night 6 +/- 5 weeks after hospital discharge, sustained improvements in PaCO2 (58 +/- 3 mm Hg, p < 0.05), PaO2/FIO2 (304 +/- 18), and functional status (5.38 +/- 1.06, p < 0.05) were observed. In four patients, measurements of respiratory rate, tidal volume, minute ventilation, dyspnea, discomfort with the face mask, and mask and mouth leaks were made during 30-min sessions of NPPV applied at constant levels via all three masks (N, NO, TFM). Discomfort with the face mask (0.38 +/- 0.18 vs 1.44 +/- 0.34 vs 2.38 +/- 0.32, p < 0.05) and mask leaks (0.44 +/- 0.18 vs 1.89 +/- 0.39 vs 1.89 +/- 0.35, p < 0.05) were least during NPPV via TFM compared with the N or NO masks, respectively. Moreover, expired tidal volume was highest (804 +/- 10 vs 498 +/- 9 vs 537 +/- 13 ml, p < 0.05) and PaCO2 lowest (51 +/- 2 vs 57 +/- 2 vs 58 +/- 3, p < 0.05) during NPPV via the TFM compared with N or NO masks. We conclude that NPPV delivered via a Total mask ensures a comfortable, stable patient-mask interface and improves gas exchange in selected patients intolerant of more conventional N or NO masks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7924481     DOI: 10.1378/chest.106.4.1109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  14 in total

Review 1.  Non-invasive ventilation for the management of acute hypercapnic respiratory failure due to exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  Christian R Osadnik; Vanessa S Tee; Kristin V Carson-Chahhoud; Joanna Picot; Jadwiga A Wedzicha; Brian J Smith
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-07-13

2.  Equivalence of nasal and oronasal masks during initial CPAP titration for obstructive sleep apnea syndrome.

Authors:  Ming Teo; Terence Amis; Sharon Lee; Karina Falland; Stephen Lambert; John Wheatley
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 5.849

3.  Choosing an Oronasal Mask to Deliver Continuous Positive Airway Pressure May Cause More Upper Airway Obstruction or Lead to Higher Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Requirements than a Nasal Mask in Some Patients: A Case Series.

Authors:  Justin R Ng; Vinod Aiyappan; Jeremy Mercer; Peter G Catcheside; Ching Li Chai-Coetzer; R Doug McEvoy; Nick Antic
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 4.062

4.  Protocol-based noninvasive positive pressure ventilation for acute respiratory failure.

Authors:  Tadashi Kikuchi; Satoshi Toba; Yukio Sekiguchi; Tomomi Iwashita; Hiroshi Imamura; Masatomo Kitamura; Kenichi Nitta; Katsunori Mochizuki; Kazufumi Okamoto
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2010-12-09       Impact factor: 2.078

5.  Effects of continuous (CPAP) and bi-level positive airway pressure (BiPAP) on extravascular lung water after extubation of the trachea in patients following coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  R Gust; A Gottschalk; H Schmidt; B W Böttiger; H Böhrer; E Martin
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  Cephalic versus oronasal mask for noninvasive ventilation in acute hypercapnic respiratory failure.

Authors:  Antoine Cuvelier; Wilfried Pujol; Stéphanie Pramil; Luis Carlos Molano; Catherine Viacroze; Jean-François Muir
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  Head helmet versus face mask for non-invasive continuous positive airway pressure: a physiological study.

Authors:  Nicolò Patroniti; Giuseppe Foti; Annamaria Manfio; Anna Coppo; Giacomo Bellani; Antonio Pesenti
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-08-28       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation delivered by helmet vs. standard face mask.

Authors:  Davide Chiumello; Paolo Pelosi; Eleonora Carlesso; Paolo Severgnini; Michele Aspesi; Chiara Gamberoni; Massimo Antonelli; Giorgio Conti; Maurizio Chiaranda; Luciano Gattinoni
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-06-12       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 9.  Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation as treatment for acute respiratory failure in critically ill patients.

Authors:  M Antonelli; G Conti
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2000-01-24       Impact factor: 9.097

10.  Adaptation to different noninvasive ventilation masks in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Renata Matos da Silva; Karina Tavares Timenetsky; Renata Cristina Miranda Neves; Liane Hirano Shigemichi; Sandra Sayuri Kanda; Carla Maekawa; Eliezer Silva; Raquel Afonso Caserta Eid
Journal:  J Bras Pneumol       Date:  2013 Jun-Aug       Impact factor: 2.624

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.