Literature DB >> 7918217

The 'OFF' response of the human electroretinogram does not contribute to the brief flash 'b-wave'.

W Seiple1, K Holopigian.   

Abstract

It has been assumed that the 'ON' and 'OFF' responses of the human electroretinogram (ERG) interact to produce a single waveform when brief flashes are used. To test this assumption, we examined the separate effects of stimulus intensity, the level of retinal illuminance and stimulus duration on the ERG. Both 'ON' and 'OFF' response amplitude decreased as stimulus intensity was decreased and as the level of retinal illumination was reduced. When stimulus duration was reduced, the amplitude of the 'OFF' response decreased; however, the amplitude of the 'ON' response increased. Summing of the 'ON' and 'OFF' response waveforms could not account for the increased amplitude in response to brief stimuli or for the changes in ERG wave shape. These results indicate that there is not a significant corneally recordable 'OFF' response elicited by brief stimuli, such as those commonly used to record the flash ERG.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7918217     DOI: 10.1017/s0952523800002972

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vis Neurosci        ISSN: 0952-5238            Impact factor:   3.241


  8 in total

1.  Assessment of local cone on- and off-pathway function using multifocal ERG technique.

Authors:  M Kondo; Y Miyake
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  On- and off-response ERGs elicited by sawtooth stimuli in normal subjects and glaucoma patients.

Authors:  Gobinda Pangeni; Robert Lämmer; Ralf P Tornow; Folkert K Horn; Jan Kremers
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  ON- and OFF-response of the photopic electroretinogram in relation to stimulus characteristics.

Authors:  Maja Sustar; Marko Hawlina; Jelka Brecelj
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-08-12       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  The photopic negative response of the Light-adapted 3.0 ERG in clinical settings.

Authors:  Gonzalo Ortiz; David Drucker; Connor Hyde; Joseph Staffetti; Jan Kremers; Radouil Tzekov
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  Changes in the ERG d-wave with vigabatrin treatment in a pediatric cohort.

Authors:  Rachel Dragas; Carol Westall; Tom Wright
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  Full-field electroretinogram response to increment and decrement stimuli.

Authors:  Eric Vukmanic; Kate Godwin; Pan Shi; Alan Hughes; Paul DeMarco
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 2.379

7.  Distinct responses of cones and melanopsin-expressing retinal ganglion cells in the human electroretinogram.

Authors:  Yumi Fukuda; Shigekazu Higuchi; Akira Yasukouchi; Takeshi Morita
Journal:  J Physiol Anthropol       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 2.867

8.  Electrophysiological responses from intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells are diminished in glaucoma patients.

Authors:  Manami Kuze; Takeshi Morita; Yumi Fukuda; Mineo Kondo; Kazuo Tsubota; Masahiko Ayaki
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2016-08-16
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.