Literature DB >> 7912189

Cell proliferation and chemical carcinogenesis: symposium overview.

R L Melnick1, J Huff, J C Barrett, R R Maronpot, G Lucier, C J Portier.   

Abstract

Cancer, by definition, is a proliferative disease. The fundamental scientific issue explored at the international symposium "Cell Proliferation and Chemical Carcinogenesis" was the impact of chemically enhanced cell proliferation on the dynamic carcinogenic processes. This conference, held at the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences January 14-16, 1992, provided an open forum for the exchange of new results, information, and ideas in four areas: a) general principles of cell division and carcinogenesis, b) critical evaluation of cell proliferation methodologies, c) cell proliferation and modeling of organ-specific carcinogenesis, and d) cell proliferation and human carcinogenesis. This overview summarizes key findings from that symposium. The general view expressed was that although cell proliferation is involved inextricably in the development of cancers, chemically enhanced cell division does not reliably predict carcinogenicity. Our knowledge of the multistep nature of carcinogenesis has advanced substantially during recent years; however, much still needs to be learned. A greater understanding of the cellular and molecular events in chemical carcinogenesis should improve all aspects of the overall risk assessment process, including extrapolations based on dose, species, and interindividual differences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 7912189      PMCID: PMC1519432          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.93101s53

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  27 in total

Review 1.  Using cell replication data in mathematical modeling in carcinogenesis.

Authors:  C J Portier; A Kopp-Schneider; C D Sherman
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 9.031

2.  Use of cell proliferation data in cancer risk assessment: FDA view.

Authors:  R J Scheuplein
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 3.  Control of G1 arrest after DNA damage.

Authors:  M B Kastan; S J Kuerbitz
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 9.031

4.  Hypomethylation of DNA: a possible nongenotoxic mechanism underlying the role of cell proliferation in carcinogenesis.

Authors:  J I Goodman; J L Counts
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 5.  Gap junctional intercellular communication and cell proliferation during rat liver carcinogenesis.

Authors:  H Yamasaki; V Krutovskikh; M Mesnil; A Columbano; H Tsuda; N Ito
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 6.  Role of programmed cell death in carcinogenesis.

Authors:  J T Isaacs
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 7.  Compensatory regeneration, mitogen-induced liver growth, and multistage chemical carcinogenesis.

Authors:  G M Ledda-Columbano; P Coni; G Simbula; I Zedda; A Columbano
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 9.031

8.  Cell proliferation and forestomach carcinogenesis.

Authors:  N Ito; M Hirose; S Takahashi
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 9.  Cell proliferation and renal carcinogenesis.

Authors:  B G Short
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 10.  Cell proliferation and carcinogenesis: a brief history and current view based on an IARC workshop report. International Agency for Research on Cancer.

Authors:  L Tomatis
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Evaluating the mechanistic evidence and key data gaps in assessing the potential carcinogenicity of carbon nanotubes and nanofibers in humans.

Authors:  Eileen D Kuempel; Marie-Claude Jaurand; Peter Møller; Yasuo Morimoto; Norihiro Kobayashi; Kent E Pinkerton; Linda M Sargent; Roel C H Vermeulen; Bice Fubini; Agnes B Kane
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 5.635

Review 2.  Epigenetic alterations induced by genotoxic occupational and environmental human chemical carcinogens: A systematic literature review.

Authors:  Grace Chappell; Igor P Pogribny; Kathryn Z Guyton; Ivan Rusyn
Journal:  Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 5.657

Review 3.  Implications for risk assessment of suggested nongenotoxic mechanisms of chemical carcinogenesis.

Authors:  R L Melnick; M C Kohn; C J Portier
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 4.  A reexamination of the PPAR-alpha activation mode of action as a basis for assessing human cancer risks of environmental contaminants.

Authors:  Kathryn Z Guyton; Weihsueh A Chiu; Thomas F Bateson; Jennifer Jinot; Cheryl Siegel Scott; Rebecca C Brown; Jane C Caldwell
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 9.031

5.  The carcinogenesis bioassay in perspective: application in identifying human cancer hazards.

Authors:  V A Fung; J C Barrett; J Huff
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1995 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 6.  Absence of morphologic correlation between chemical toxicity and chemical carcinogenesis.

Authors:  J Huff
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 7.  Use of rodent carcinogenicity test results for determining potential cancer risk to humans.

Authors:  P F Infante
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 9.031

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.