Literature DB >> 7588478

The carcinogenesis bioassay in perspective: application in identifying human cancer hazards.

V A Fung1, J C Barrett, J Huff.   

Abstract

The selection process for chemicals tested in the rodent carcinogenicity bioassay has been biased toward chemicals suspected of potential carcinogenicity. Results from carcinogenicity bioassays of 400 chemicals tested by the National Cancer Institute/National Toxicology Program (NCI/NTP) were analyzed to determine the dependence of positive results on chemical selection criteria: those suspected of being carcinogenic and those selected based on large volumes produced and widespread exposures. Of these chemicals, 210 (52%) induced carcinogenicity in at least one organ of one sex of one species of the four sex/species groups typically used by NCI/NTP. Only 92 of the 400 chemicals (23%) were positive in two species and thus by international criteria are considered likely to pose a carcinogenic hazard to humans. A total of 267 chemicals (67%) were selected as suspect carcinogens, and 187 (68%) of these were carcinogenic. Suspect chemicals account for 86% of chemicals with at least one positive result and account for 90% of chemicals considered positive in two species. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) lists only 5 of the 400 chemicals as carcinogenic to humans (group 1) and 10 as probably carcinogenic to humans (group 2A). The majority (80%) of the 133 chemicals selected only on production/exposure considerations were not carcinogenic in animals, even when tested at the maximum tolerated (or minimally toxic) dose. Only 9 (6.8%) were positive in two species, and none is listed in IARC groups 1 or 2A. Thus, on the basis of our analyses we predict that less than 5-10% of the 75,000 chemicals in commercial use might be reasonably anticipated to be carcinogenic to humans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7588478      PMCID: PMC1522191          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.95103680

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  28 in total

1.  Design strategies, results and evaluations of long-term chemical carcinogenesis studies.

Authors:  J Huff
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 5.024

Review 2.  Scientific concepts, value, and significance of chemical carcinogenesis studies.

Authors:  J Huff; J Haseman; D Rall
Journal:  Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 13.820

3.  Mitogenesis is only one factor in carcinogenesis.

Authors:  I B Weinstein
Journal:  Science       Date:  1991-01-25       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  Prediction of the outcome of rodent carcinogenicity bioassays currently being conducted on 44 chemicals by the National Toxicology Program.

Authors:  R W Tennant; J Spalding; S Stasiewicz; J Ashby
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 3.000

Review 5.  Too many rodent carcinogens: mitogenesis increases mutagenesis.

Authors:  B N Ames; L S Gold
Journal:  Science       Date:  1990-08-31       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 6.  Carcinogenesis studies: results of 398 experiments on 104 chemicals from the U.S. National Toxicology Program.

Authors:  J E Huff; E E McConnell; J K Haseman; G A Boorman; S L Eustis; B A Schwetz; G N Rao; C W Jameson; L G Hart; D P Rall
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 5.691

7.  Increased cell division as a cause of human cancer.

Authors:  S Preston-Martin; M C Pike; R K Ross; P A Jones; B E Henderson
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1990-12-01       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 8.  Genetic and cellular basis of multistep carcinogenesis.

Authors:  J A Boyd; J C Barrett
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 12.310

Review 9.  Rationale and strategies for chemoprevention of cancer in humans.

Authors:  J S Bertram; L N Kolonel; F L Meyskens
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1987-06-01       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 10.  An overview of prechronic and chronic toxicity/carcinogenicity experimental study designs and criteria used by the National Toxicology Program.

Authors:  R S Chhabra; J E Huff; B S Schwetz; J Selkirk
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  16 in total

1.  Clarifying carcinogenicity of ethylbenzene.

Authors:  James Huff; Po Chan; Ronald Melnick
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2010-08-17       Impact factor: 3.271

2.  A radial-distribution-function approach for predicting rodent carcinogenicity.

Authors:  Aliuska Helguera Morales; Miguel Angel Cabrera Pérez; Maykel Pérez González
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2006-01-19       Impact factor: 1.810

3.  DETERMINING DISEASE CAUSALITY FROM EXPERIMENTAL TOXICOLOGY STUDIES.

Authors:  Ronald L Melnick; John R Bucher
Journal:  J Law Policy       Date:  2005

4.  Animal Models of Chemical Carcinogenesis: Driving Breakthroughs in Cancer Research for 100 Years.

Authors:  Christopher J Kemp
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Protoc       Date:  2015-10-01

5.  Power, expertise and the limits of representative democracy: genetics as scientific progress or political legitimation in carcinogenic risk assessment of pharmaceuticals?

Authors:  John Abraham; Rachel Ballinger
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2011-07-20

Review 6.  Genetic toxicology in the 21st century: reflections and future directions.

Authors:  Brinda Mahadevan; Ronald D Snyder; Michael D Waters; R Daniel Benz; Raymond A Kemper; Raymond R Tice; Ann M Richard
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 3.216

7.  Multicomponent criteria for predicting carcinogenicity: dataset of 30 NTP chemicals.

Authors:  J Huff; E Weisburger; V A Fung
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 8.  Cadmium-induced cancers in animals and in humans.

Authors:  James Huff; Ruth M Lunn; Michael P Waalkes; Lorenzo Tomatis; Peter F Infante
Journal:  Int J Occup Environ Health       Date:  2007 Apr-Jun

Review 9.  Benzene-induced cancers: abridged history and occupational health impact.

Authors:  James Huff
Journal:  Int J Occup Environ Health       Date:  2007 Apr-Jun

10.  Understanding sex differences in environmental health: a thought leaders' roundtable.

Authors:  Sarah K Keitt; Thomas F Fagan; Sherry A Marts
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.