Literature DB >> 7906931

Intravenous sedation in accident and emergency departments: a nationwide survey.

B H Aslam1, I Woods.   

Abstract

Anonymous questionnaires regarding the practice of intravenous sedation were sent to all accident and emergency departments in England and Wales. The response rate was 63%. Intravenous sedation was used by 94% of the departments who replied. In 19% of these departments it was administered only by middle grade or senior grade clinicians, while in the remaining 81% sedation was also administered by junior grade clinicians. Diazepam, midazolam and opioids were the most commonly used agents. The use of monitoring was variable. In 16% of the units no monitoring was used routinely. ECG monitoring was carried out by 48% of the departments, non-invasive blood pressure monitoring by 67% and pulse oximetry by 65%. Our findings indicate there is a need for guidelines regarding patient selection, the choice of drugs and the monitoring of patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7906931      PMCID: PMC2502195     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  9 in total

Review 1.  Office sedation.

Authors:  J C Cruickshank; S H Sykes
Journal:  Adv Dermatol       Date:  1992

2.  Midazolam for outpatient sedation.

Authors:  D L Betcher; N Burnham
Journal:  J Pediatr Oncol Nurs       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 1.636

3.  Bolus dose with continuous infusion of midazolam as sedation for outpatient surgery.

Authors:  N H Luyk; M Zacharias; S Wanwimolaruk
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.789

4.  A safe method for sedating and monitoring patients for upper and lower gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Authors:  I B Simon; R J Lewis; R M Satava
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 0.688

5.  Frequent hypoxemia and apnea after sedation with midazolam and fentanyl.

Authors:  P L Bailey; N L Pace; M A Ashburn; J W Moll; K A East; T H Stanley
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 7.892

6.  Morbidity and mortality from pharmacosedation and general anesthesia in the dental office.

Authors:  J A Krippaehne; M T Montgomery
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 1.895

7.  Recommendations for standards of sedation and patient monitoring during gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Authors:  G D Bell; R F McCloy; J E Charlton; D Campbell; N A Dent; M W Gear; R F Logan; C H Swan
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  Sedation for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: results of a nationwide survey.

Authors:  T K Daneshmend; G D Bell; R F Logan
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  Major morbidity or mortality from office anesthetic procedures: a closed-claim analysis of 13 cases.

Authors:  J T Jastak; R M Peskin
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  1991 Mar-Apr
  9 in total
  3 in total

1.  A risk management audit: are we complying with the national guidelines for sedation by non-anaesthetists?

Authors:  M F Nicol
Journal:  J Accid Emerg Med       Date:  1999-03

2.  A survey of teaching and the use of clinical guidelines in accident and emergency departments.

Authors:  P Hormbrey; B S Todd; C D Mansfield; D V Skinner
Journal:  J Accid Emerg Med       Date:  1996-03

3.  Sedation practice in a Scottish teaching hospital emergency department.

Authors:  R A Duncan; L Symington; S Thakore
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.740

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.