Literature DB >> 7906390

Evolution of distinct developmental functions of three Drosophila genes by acquisition of different cis-regulatory regions.

X Li1, M Noll.   

Abstract

It is generally accepted that the specific function of a gene depends on its coding sequence. The three paired-box and homeobox genes paired (prd), gooseberry (gsb) and gooseberry neuro (gsbn) have distinct developmental functions in Drosophila embryogenesis. During the syncytial blastoderm stage, the pair-rule gene prd activates segment-polarity genes, such as gsb, wingless (wg), and engrailed (en), in segmentally repeated stripes. After germ-band extension, gsb maintains the expression of wg, which in turn specifies the denticle pattern by repressing a default state of ubiquitous denticle formation in the ventral epidermis. In addition, gsb activates gsbn, which is expressed mainly in the central nervous system, suggesting that gsbn is involved in neural development. Here we show that, despite the functional difference and the considerably diverged coding sequence of these genes, their proteins have conserved the same function. The finding that the essential difference between genes may reside in their cis-regulatory regions exemplifies an important evolutionary mechanism of how function diversifies after gene duplication.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7906390     DOI: 10.1038/367083a0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  36 in total

1.  The role of population size, pleiotropy and fitness effects of mutations in the evolution of overlapping gene functions.

Authors:  A Wagner
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Redundancy, antiredundancy, and the robustness of genomes.

Authors:  David C Krakauer; Joshua B Plotkin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-01-29       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Coupling of enhancer and insulator properties identified in two retrotransposons modulates their mutagenic impact on nearby genes.

Authors:  Caroline Conte; Bernard Dastugue; Chantal Vaury
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 4.  Preservation of duplicate genes by complementary, degenerative mutations.

Authors:  A Force; M Lynch; F B Pickett; A Amores; Y L Yan; J Postlethwait
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Duplicate genes and robustness to transient gene knock-downs in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Gavin C Conant; Andreas Wagner
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Reconstructing the evolutionary history of paralogous APETALA1/FRUITFULL-like genes in grasses (Poaceae).

Authors:  Jill C Preston; Elizabeth A Kellogg
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-07-02       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Repression and loss of gene expression outpaces activation and gain in recently duplicated fly genes.

Authors:  Todd H Oakley; Bjørn Ostman; Asa C V Wilson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-07-24       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Decoupled evolution of coding region and mRNA expression patterns after gene duplication: implications for the neutralist-selectionist debate.

Authors:  A Wagner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-06-06       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  NFL, the tobacco homolog of FLORICAULA and LEAFY, is transcriptionally expressed in both vegetative and floral meristems.

Authors:  A J Kelly; M B Bonnlander; D R Meeks-Wagner
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 11.277

Review 10.  Regeneration and the need for simpler model organisms.

Authors:  Alejandro Sánchez Alvarado
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2004-05-29       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.