Literature DB >> 7898880

Age differences in the useful field of view: an eye movement analysis.

C T Scialfa1, D M Thomas, K M Joffe.   

Abstract

Age differences in the useful field of view (UFOV) were examined by asking younger (mean age = 24 years) and older (mean age = 64 years) observers to search for two oriented line targets. These targets were presented at eccentricities ranging from 4 degrees to 14 degrees, and were embedded in either no distractors, homogeneous distractors, or heterogeneous distractors. Eye movements were recorded, along with reaction time (RT) and accuracy. The eye movement data indicated that older observers had more difficulty locating peripheral targets, particularly when they were embedded in heterogeneous distractors. Furthermore, the greater effects of eccentricity and distractor type found in the RT's of older adults were eliminated when age differences in saccade number were partialled out. These findings suggest that age differences in search are largely attributable to factors other than selective attention.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7898880     DOI: 10.1097/00006324-199412000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   1.973


  15 in total

1.  The role of attentional breadth in perceptual change detection.

Authors:  H L Pringle; D E Irwin; A F Kramer; P Atchley
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-03

2.  A search-by-clusters model of visual search: fits to data from younger and older adults.

Authors:  William J Hoyer; John Cerella; Norbou G Buchler
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 4.077

3.  Effect of age and pop out distracter on attended field of view.

Authors:  Raiju J Babu; Susan J Leat; Elizabeth L Irving
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2014-03-20

4.  Age-related declines in car following performance under simulated fog conditions.

Authors:  Rui Ni; Julie J Kang; George J Andersen
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  2010-05

5.  Age-related preference for geometric spatial cues during real-world navigation.

Authors:  Marcia Bécu; Denis Sheynikhovich; Guillaume Tatur; Catherine Persephone Agathos; Luca Leonardo Bologna; José-Alain Sahel; Angelo Arleo
Journal:  Nat Hum Behav       Date:  2019-09-23

6.  Sensorimotor and cognitive factors associated with the age-related increase of visual field dependence: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Catherine P Agathos; Delphine Bernardin; Delphine Huchet; Anne-Catherine Scherlen; Christine Assaiante; Brice Isableu
Journal:  Age (Dordr)       Date:  2015-06-30

7.  Spatial representations in older adults are not modified by action: Evidence from tool use.

Authors:  Matthew C Costello; Emily K Bloesch; Christopher C Davoli; Nicholas D Panting; Richard A Abrams; James R Brockmole
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2015-06-08

8.  Age-related decline of peripheral visual processing: the role of eye movements.

Authors:  Rainer Beurskens; Otmar Bock
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-12-17       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Developmental Changes in Natural Viewing Behavior: Bottom-Up and Top-Down Differences between Children, Young Adults and Older Adults.

Authors:  Alper Açık; Adjmal Sarwary; Rafael Schultze-Kraft; Selim Onat; Peter König
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2010-11-25

10.  Effects of age and eccentricity on visual target detection.

Authors:  Nicole Gruber; René M Müri; Urs P Mosimann; Rahel Bieri; Andrea Aeschimann; Giuseppe A Zito; Prabitha Urwyler; Thomas Nyffeler; Tobias Nef
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 5.750

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.