Literature DB >> 31548677

Age-related preference for geometric spatial cues during real-world navigation.

Marcia Bécu1, Denis Sheynikhovich2, Guillaume Tatur2, Catherine Persephone Agathos2, Luca Leonardo Bologna2,3, José-Alain Sahel2,4,5,6, Angelo Arleo7.   

Abstract

Ageing effects on spatial navigation are characterized mainly in terms of impaired allocentric strategies. However, an alternative hypothesis is that navigation difficulties in aged people are associated with deficits in processing and encoding spatial cues. We tested this hypothesis by studying how geometry and landmark cues control navigation in young and older adults in a real, ecological environment. Recordings of body and gaze dynamics revealed a preference for geometry-based navigation in older adults, and for landmark-based navigation in younger ones. While cue processing was associated with specific fixation patterns, advanced age manifested itself in a longer reorientation time, reflecting an unbalanced exploration-exploitation trade-off in scanning policies. Moreover, a battery of tests revealed a specific cognitive deficit in older adults with geometric preference. These results suggest that allocentric strategy deficits in ageing can result from difficulties related to landmark coding, and predict recovery of allocentric strategies in geometrically polarized environments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31548677     DOI: 10.1038/s41562-019-0718-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Hum Behav        ISSN: 2397-3374


  66 in total

1.  Environmental topography and postural control demands shape aging-associated decrements in spatial navigation performance.

Authors:  Martin Lövdén; Michael Schellenbach; Barbara Grossman-Hutter; Antonio Krüger; Ulman Lindenberger
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2005-12

2.  Are older adults more dependent on visual information in regulating self-motion than younger adults?

Authors:  P G Anderson; B Nienhuis; T Mulder; W Hulstijn
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 1.328

3.  Age differences in visual path integration.

Authors:  Omar Mahmood; Diane Adamo; Emily Briceno; Scott D Moffat
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  How cognitive aging affects multisensory integration of navigational cues.

Authors:  Sarah L Bates; Thomas Wolbers
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 4.673

5.  Human aging and spatial vision.

Authors:  R Sekuler; L P Hutman; C J Owsley
Journal:  Science       Date:  1980-09-12       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Lateral stability, sensorimotor function and falls in older people.

Authors:  S R Lord; M W Rogers; A Howland; R Fitzpatrick
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 5.562

7.  Age differences in the neural systems supporting human allocentric spatial navigation.

Authors:  Scott D Moffat; Wendy Elkins; Susan M Resnick
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2005-06-27       Impact factor: 4.673

8.  Reduced grid-cell-like representations in adults at genetic risk for Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Lukas Kunz; Tobias Navarro Schröder; Hweeling Lee; Christian Montag; Bernd Lachmann; Rayna Sariyska; Martin Reuter; Rüdiger Stirnberg; Tony Stöcker; Paul Christian Messing-Floeter; Juergen Fell; Christian F Doeller; Nikolai Axmacher
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Spatial navigation-a unique window into physiological and pathological aging.

Authors:  Ivana Gazova; Kamil Vlcek; Jan Laczó; Zuzana Nedelska; Eva Hyncicova; Ivana Mokrisova; Katerina Sheardova; Jakub Hort
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 5.750

Review 10.  The Aging Navigational System.

Authors:  Adam W Lester; Scott D Moffat; Jan M Wiener; Carol A Barnes; Thomas Wolbers
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 17.173

View more
  6 in total

1.  Postural Control While Walking Interferes With Spatial Learning in Older Adults Navigating in a Real Environment.

Authors:  Catherine Persephone Agathos; Stephen Ramanoël; Marcia Bécu; Delphine Bernardin; Christophe Habas; Angelo Arleo
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 5.750

2.  Prediction of Disorientation by Accelerometric and Gait Features in Young and Older Adults Navigating in a Virtually Enriched Environment.

Authors:  Stefan J Teipel; Chimezie O Amaefule; Stefan Lüdtke; Doreen Görß; Sofia Faraza; Sven Bruhn; Thomas Kirste
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-04-25

3.  Mobile brain/body imaging of landmark-based navigation with high-density EEG.

Authors:  Alexandre Delaux; Jean-Baptiste de Saint Aubert; Stephen Ramanoël; Marcia Bécu; Lukas Gehrke; Marius Klug; Ricardo Chavarriaga; José-Alain Sahel; Klaus Gramann; Angelo Arleo
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 3.698

4.  Unmasking selective path integration deficits in Alzheimer's disease risk carriers.

Authors:  Anne Bierbrauer; Lukas Kunz; Carlos A Gomes; Maike Luhmann; Lorena Deuker; Stephan Getzmann; Edmund Wascher; Patrick D Gajewski; Jan G Hengstler; Marina Fernandez-Alvarez; Mercedes Atienza; Davide M Cammisuli; Francesco Bonatti; Carlo Pruneti; Antonio Percesepe; Youssef Bellaali; Bernard Hanseeuw; Bryan A Strange; Jose L Cantero; Nikolai Axmacher
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 14.136

5.  Age-related differences in visual encoding and response strategies contribute to spatial memory deficits.

Authors:  Vladislava Segen; Marios N Avraamides; Timothy J Slattery; Jan M Wiener
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2021-02

6.  Assessing Photoreceptor Status in Retinal Dystrophies: From High-Resolution Imaging to Functional Vision.

Authors:  José-Alain Sahel; Kate Grieve; Chloé Pagot; Colas Authié; Saddek Mohand-Said; Michel Paques; Isabelle Audo; Karine Becker; Anne-Elisabeth Chaumet-Riffaud; Line Azoulay; Emmanuel Gutman; Thierry Léveillard; Christina Zeitz; Serge Picaud; Deniz Dalkara; Katia Marazova
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 5.258

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.