Literature DB >> 7898346

A kinematic comparison of overground and treadmill running.

B M Nigg1, R W De Boer, V Fisher.   

Abstract

Treadmills are often used in research projects to simulate overground locomotion, assuming that locomotion is similar on a treadmill and overground. The purpose of this investigation was to determine whether a treadmill could be used to simulate overground locomotion. Twenty-two subjects ran on four different surfaces: overground and three treadmills that differed in size and power. The kinematics of the right leg and foot were studied using two high-speed Locam cameras (lateral and posterior view). The subjects ran in two different shoes at four different speeds (3.0-6.0 m.s-1). The differences in the kinematics between treadmill and overground running could be divided into systematic and subject dependent components. Subjects systematically planted their feet in a flatter position on the treadmill than overground. Most of the lower extremity kinematic variables, however, showed inconsistent trends for individual subjects, depending on the individual subject's running style, running speed, and shoe/treadmill situation. The differences were substantial. It is not yet understood how the human locomotor system adapts to a particular treadmill running situation. However, it is concluded that individual assessment of running kinematics on a treadmill for shoe or shoe orthotic assessment may possibly lead to inadequate conclusions about overground running.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7898346

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  41 in total

1.  Sprint running performance: comparison between treadmill and field conditions.

Authors:  Jean-Benoît Morin; Pierrick Sève
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-01-06       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Physiological responses to nordic walking, walking and jogging.

Authors:  Thorsten Schiffer; Axel Knicker; Uwe Hoffman; Brigitte Harwig; Wildor Hollmann; Heiko K Strüder
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2006-06-24       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Effects of optic flow on spontaneous overground walk-to-run transition.

Authors:  Kristof De Smet; P Malcolm; M Lenoir; V Segers; D De Clercq
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-11-26       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Anthropometric, gait and strength characteristics of kenyan distance runners.

Authors:  Pui W Kong; Hendrik de Heer
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 2.988

5.  Comparison of lower extremity kinematic curves during overground and treadmill running.

Authors:  Rebecca E Fellin; Kurt Manal; Irene S Davis
Journal:  J Appl Biomech       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.833

6.  Lower extremity biomechanical relationships with different speeds in traditional, minimalist, and barefoot footwear.

Authors:  William Fredericks; Seth Swank; Madeline Teisberg; Bethany Hampton; Lance Ridpath; Jandy B Hanna
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 2.988

7.  Shoe drop has opposite influence on running pattern when running overground or on a treadmill.

Authors:  Nicolas Chambon; Nicolas Delattre; Nils Guéguen; Eric Berton; Guillaume Rao
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 3.078

8.  Using step width to compare locomotor biomechanics between extinct, non-avian theropod dinosaurs and modern obligate bipeds.

Authors:  P J Bishop; C J Clemente; R E Weems; D F Graham; L P Lamas; J R Hutchinson; J Rubenson; R S Wilson; S A Hocknull; R S Barrett; D G Lloyd
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 4.118

9.  Muscle contributions to fore-aft and vertical body mass center accelerations over a range of running speeds.

Authors:  Samuel R Hamner; Scott L Delp
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 10.  An Evidence-Based Videotaped Running Biomechanics Analysis.

Authors:  Richard B Souza
Journal:  Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 1.784

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.