Literature DB >> 7889641

A stigmatizing effect of the carrier status for cystic fibrosis?

G Evers-Kiebooms1, L Denayer, M Welkenhuysen, J J Cassiman, H Van den Berghe.   

Abstract

The emotional impact of carrier detection for CF was assessed in a group of adults tested before 1992. Of the 200 adults who received a mailed questionnaire, 70% participated. One third were CF gene carriers. The Health Orientation Scale (HOS) was used to evaluate perceived feelings about three situations: (a) How would you describe your feelings about yourself when you consider your test result? (b) How do you think most people feel when they are told that they carry the CF gene? (c) How do you think most people feel when they are told that they do not carry the CF gene? Comparing the profiles of CF carriers and non-carriers, we found that carriers had significantly less positive feelings about themselves than non-carriers. Carriers as well as non-carriers attribute significantly more negative feelings to most carriers of the CF gene than to most non-carriers. Moreover, carriers of the Cf gene attribute more negative feelings to other CF carriers than to themselves. Analysis of variance revealed a significant effect of carrier status on self-description, as well as a significant effect of carrier status and degree of kinship with a CF patient on feelings attributed to most carriers. Although these results suggest some danger of stigmatization of CF carriers, the cognitive bias of 'illusory superiority' seems to counterbalance some of its effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7889641     DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.1994.tb04174.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Genet        ISSN: 0009-9163            Impact factor:   4.438


  7 in total

1.  Carrier testing of children for two X linked diseases in a family based setting: a retrospective long term psychosocial evaluation.

Authors:  O Järvinen; A M Aalto; A E Lehesjoki; M Lindlöf; I Söderling; A Uutela; H Kääriäinen
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 6.318

Review 2.  Inappropriate genetic testing of children.

Authors:  A Fryer
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 3.  Illness representations, self-regulation, and genetic counseling: a theoretical review.

Authors:  Shoshana Shiloh
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Living with genetic risk: effect on adolescent self-concept.

Authors:  Allyn McConkie-Rosell; Gail A Spiridigliozzi; Elizabeth Melvin; Deborah V Dawson; Ave M Lachiewicz
Journal:  Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 3.908

Review 5.  Social and psychological issues associated with the new genetics.

Authors:  S Macintyre
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1997-08-29       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Threat to Parental Role: A Possible Mechanism of Altered Self-Concept Related to Carrier Knowledge.

Authors:  A McConkie-Rosell; B M DeVellis
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  What is in a cause? Exploring the relationship between genetic cause and felt stigma.

Authors:  Pamela Sankar; Mildred K Cho; Paul Root Wolpe; Cynthia Schairer
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 8.822

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.