Literature DB >> 7885803

Target and nontarget grouping in visual search.

J Duncan1.   

Abstract

The results of Driver et al. rule out strictly element-by-element approaches to the problem of easy conjunction search. Neither can they be explained by a simple bias toward mismatching display elements, at least as it is implemented in guided search. Such a bias is the only means of within-display interaction in many current models (Sagi & Julesz, 1984; Ullman, 1984). Instead, models (Sagi & Julesz, 1984; Ullman, 1984). Instead, the results suggest that perceptual grouping brings a bias toward common fate. For nontarget groups, this fate is rejection from further consideration; for target groups, complementarily, it is selection for further processing.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7885803     DOI: 10.3758/bf03211854

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  21 in total

1.  A theory of visual attention.

Authors:  C Bundesen
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: time course of activation and resistance to interruption.

Authors:  H J Müller; P M Rabbitt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Beyond the search surface: visual search and attentional engagement.

Authors:  J Duncan; G Humphreys
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Visual search and stimulus similarity.

Authors:  J Duncan; G W Humphreys
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Interactions between items in visual search.

Authors:  I E Gordon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1968-03

6.  Serial and parallel processing of visual feature conjunctions.

Authors:  K Nakayama; G H Silverman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1986 Mar 20-26       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Visual routines.

Authors:  S Ullman
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1984-12

8.  Color segregation and visual search.

Authors:  C Bundesen; L F Pedersen
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1983-05

9.  A feature-integration theory of attention.

Authors:  A M Treisman; G Gelade
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Visual search through color displays: effects of target-background similarity and background uniformity.

Authors:  E W Farmer; R M Taylor
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1980-03
View more
  8 in total

1.  Perceptual grouping by similarity of surface roughness in haptics: the influence of task difficulty.

Authors:  V Van Aarsen; K E Overvliet
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Global and local perceptual style, field-independence, and central coherence: An attempt at concept validation.

Authors:  Elizabeth Milne; Marcin Szczerbinski
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2009-04-27

3.  Viewing the dynamics and control of visual attention through the lens of electrophysiology.

Authors:  Geoffrey F Woodman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Guided search for triple conjunctions.

Authors:  Maria Nordfang; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Acoustic facilitation of object movement detection during self-motion.

Authors:  F J Calabro; S Soto-Faraco; L M Vaina
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Neural basis of feature-based contextual effects on visual search behavior.

Authors:  Kelly Shen; Martin Paré
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 3.558

7.  Parallel distractor rejection as a binding mechanism in search.

Authors:  Kevin Dent; Harriet A Allen; Jason J Braithwaite; Glyn W Humphreys
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-08-09

8.  Spatial and temporal dynamics of attentional guidance during inefficient visual search.

Authors:  Alexandre Zenon; Suliann Ben Hamed; Jean-René Duhamel; Etienne Olivier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-05-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.