Literature DB >> 78808

VEP latency and RT as power functions of luminance in the peripheral visual field.

N Osaka, M Yamamoto.   

Abstract

Behavioral correlates of P1 latency of visual evoked potentials (VEPs) were investigated using visual reaction time (RT) as a measure at the fovea, 20 degrees and 40 degrees nasal retinal eccentricities along the horizontal meridian of the right eye. Three luminances of the target in steps of 1 log units were used: 26, 260 and 2600 cd/m2. As luminance increased VEP latency and RT decreased. Further, as eccentricity increased VEP latency and RT increased. The highest product-moment coefficient of correlation (r = 0.998) was found between RT and P1 latency in the fovea, whereas the coefficient of correlation was found to be slightly small in the peripheral loci. The data (both VEPs and RTs) were fitted by the power function of the form: T = kLB + T0 where T, k, L T0 and B indicate VEP latency (or RT, scaling constant, luminance, asymptotic latency and exponent of the power function, respectively. This shows how the VEP latency and the RT can be related to luminance with exponent B. It was found that psychophysical power law governs VEP latency as well as RT with an exponent of about -0.32. It was suggested that both RT AND P1 latencies of VEP originate in the similar nonlinear visual system.

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 78808     DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(78)90214-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  5 in total

1.  The influence of visual motion on perceived position.

Authors:  David Whitney
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2002-05-01       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Influence of callosal transfer on visual cortical evoked response and the implication in the development of a visual prosthesis.

Authors:  Timothy L Siu; John W Morley
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-07-19       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation in the visual system. I. The psychophysics of visual suppression.

Authors:  Thomas Kammer; Klaas Puls; Hans Strasburger; N Jeremy Hill; Felix A Wichmann
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Small-aperture monovision and the Pulfrich experience: absence of neural adaptation effects.

Authors:  Sotiris Plainis; Dionysia Petratou; Trisevgeni Giannakopoulou; Hema Radhakrishnan; Ioannis G Pallikaris; W Neil Charman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Psychological and physiological evidence for an initial 'Rough Sketch' calculation of personal space.

Authors:  Roger B H Tootell; Sarah L Zapetis; Baktash Babadi; Zahra Nasiriavanaki; Dylan E Hughes; Kim Mueser; Michael Otto; Ed Pace-Schott; Daphne J Holt
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-25       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.