Literature DB >> 17638003

Influence of callosal transfer on visual cortical evoked response and the implication in the development of a visual prosthesis.

Timothy L Siu1, John W Morley.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The development of a visual prosthesis has been limited by an incomplete understanding of functional changes of the visual cortex accompanying deafferentation. In particular, the role of the corpus callosum in modulating these changes has not been fully evaluated. Recent experimental evidence suggests that through synaptic modulation, short-term (4-5 days) visual deafferentation can induce plastic changes in the visual cortex, leading to adaptive enhancement of residual visual input. We therefore investigated whether a compensatory rerouting of visual information can occur via the indirect transcallosal linkage after deafferentation and the influence of this interhemispheric communication on the visual evoked response of each hemisphere.
METHODS: In albino rabbits, misrouting of uncrossed optic fibres reduces ipsilateral input to a negligible degree. We thus took advantage of this congenital anomaly to model unilateral cortical and ocular deafferentation by eliminating visual input from one eye and recorded the visual evoked potential (VEP) from the intact eye.
RESULTS: In keeping with the chiasmal anomaly, no VEP was elicited from the hemisphere ipsilateral to the intact eye. This remained unchanged following unilateral visual deafferentation. The amplitude and latency of the VEP in the fellow hemisphere, however, were significantly decreased in the deafferented animals.
CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that callosal linkage does not contribute to visual evoked responses and this is not changed after short-term deafferentation. The decrease in amplitude and latency of evoked responses in the hemisphere ipsilateral to the treated eye, however, confirms the facilitatory role of callosal transfer. This observation highlights the importance of bicortical stimulation in the future design of a cortical visual prosthesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17638003     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-007-0648-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  33 in total

1.  Magnetically induced phosphenes in sighted, blind and blindsighted observers.

Authors:  A Cowey; V Walsh
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2000-09-28       Impact factor: 1.837

Review 2.  Will retinal implants restore vision?

Authors:  Eberhart Zrenner
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-02-08       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  Development of a cortical visual neuroprosthesis for the blind: the relevance of neuroplasticity.

Authors:  E Fernández; F Pelayo; S Romero; M Bongard; C Marin; A Alfaro; L Merabet
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2005-11-29       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 4.  Gene therapy and transplantation in CNS repair: the visual system.

Authors:  Alan R Harvey; Ying Hu; Simone G Leaver; Carla B Mellough; Kevin Park; Joost Verhaagen; Giles W Plant; Qi Cui
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2006-09-11       Impact factor: 21.198

Review 5.  Intraocular retinal prosthesis. Big steps to sight restoration.

Authors:  James D Weiland; Mark S Humayun
Journal:  IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct

6.  The organization of the retinal projection to the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus in pigmented and albino rats.

Authors:  R D Lund; J S Lund; R P Wise
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1974-12-15       Impact factor: 3.215

7.  Properties of visual cortical cells of the intact and the deafferented hemisphere of unilateral optic tract sectioned acute and chronic adult cats.

Authors:  M Podell; U Yinon; A Hammer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Retinogeniculate projections in the rabbits of the albino allelomorphic series1.

Authors:  K J Sanderson
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1975-01-01       Impact factor: 3.215

9.  The hemispheric dominance of cortical cells in the absence of direct visual pathways.

Authors:  U Yinon; A Hammer; M Podell
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1982-01-28       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  Comparison of electrically evoked cortical potential thresholds generated with subretinal or suprachoroidal placement of a microelectrode array in the rabbit.

Authors:  Yasuyuki Yamauchi; Luisa M Franco; Douglas J Jackson; John F Naber; R Ofer Ziv; Joseph F Rizzo; Henry J Kaplan; Volker Enzmann
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2005-02-22       Impact factor: 5.379

View more
  1 in total

1.  Monocular retinal degeneration induced by intravitreal injection of sodium iodate in rabbit eyes.

Authors:  Bum-Joo Cho; Jong-Mo Seo; Hyeong Gon Yu; Hum Chung
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 2.447

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.