Literature DB >> 7879767

The effectiveness of Class II, division 1 treatment.

K D O'Brien1, R Robbins, K W Vig, P S Vig, H Shnorhokian, R Weyant.   

Abstract

The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the effectiveness of orthodontic treatment in terms of two outcome variables, namely, the percentage change in a valid and reliable occlusal index, the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) score, and the duration of treatment. Data were collected from the records of 250 patients with Class II, Division 1 malocclusions who were treated in the Orthodontic Department of the University of Pittsburgh between 1977 and 1989. The relationships between the outcome and the treatment variables were analyzed with multiple regression techniques. Those variables significantly associated with the duration of treatment (p < 0.01) were (1) the pretreatment PAR score, (2) the number of treatment stages, (3) the percentage of appointments attended, (4) the number of appliance repairs, and (5) whether the patient was treated with or without extractions. The only variable that influenced the percentage change in PAR was the pretreatment PAR score (p < 0.01).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7879767     DOI: 10.1016/s0889-5406(95)70149-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  7 in total

1.  Retrospective evaluation of the outcome of orthodontic treatment in adults.

Authors:  T Riedmann; R Berg
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Surgical versus orthodontic correction for Class II patients: age and severity in treatment planning and treatment outcome.

Authors:  J F Tulloch; B E Lenz; C Phillips
Journal:  Semin Orthod       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 0.970

3.  What can be achieved with removable orthodontic appliances?

Authors:  Rainer-Reginald Miethke; Claudia Wronski
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2009-05-31       Impact factor: 1.938

4.  The relationship between the ABO discrepancy index and treatment duration in a graduate orthodontic clinic.

Authors:  Laura D Parrish; W Eugene Roberts; Gerardo Maupome; Kelton T Stewart; Robert W Bandy; Katherine S Kula
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  Comparative time efficiency of aligner therapy and conventional edgewise braces.

Authors:  Peter H Buschang; Steven G Shaw; Mike Ross; Doug Crosby; Phillip M Campbell
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Stability of class II subdivision malocclusion treatment with 3 and 4 premolar extractions.

Authors:  Guilherme Janson; Janine Araki; Sérgio Estelita; Leonardo T Camardella
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2014-12-30       Impact factor: 2.750

7.  Retrospective analysis of orthodontic treatment outcomes and its relation to postretention stability.

Authors:  Karina Maria Salvatore de Freitas; Marcos Roberto de Freitas; Guilherme Janson; Arnaldo Pinzan; José Fernando Castanha Henriques
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.698

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.