Literature DB >> 10860060

Surgical versus orthodontic correction for Class II patients: age and severity in treatment planning and treatment outcome.

J F Tulloch1, B E Lenz, C Phillips.   

Abstract

Treatment options for Class II malocclusion include orthognathic surgery. Treatment choices are particularly difficult for young patients because of the uncertainty regarding future growth. Surgical treatment has generally been considered necessary for older patients with more severe Class II problems. The treatment records of more than 500 patients with Class II malocclusion were reviewed. Patients were grouped according to their initial treatment plan (surgery or orthodontics) and treatment outcome (overjet [OJ] reduced to < 4 mm or not). Discriminant function analyses using data from the patient's pretreatment cephalogram were used to determine whether age, in combination with malocclusion severity, could predict the choice of treatment, and whether a simple set of pretreatment variables could predict the success or failure of OJ reduction. The derived equations were tested in a similar group of growing Class II children. Although the data showed clinicians use patient's age in determining treatment choice, age did not seem to be associated with treatment outcome. The majority of the variability that determined the success or failure of OJ reduction was not explained by patient's age or malocclusion severity. These findings suggest other factors, including psychosocial variables, need to be explored if we are to gain a better understanding of why treatments succeed or fail.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10860060      PMCID: PMC3612924          DOI: 10.1016/s1073-8746(99)80017-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Orthod        ISSN: 1073-8746            Impact factor:   0.970


  16 in total

1.  Maxillary and cranial base changes during treatment with functional appliances.

Authors:  M Courtney; M Harkness; P Herbison
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 2.650

2.  The effect of early intervention on skeletal pattern in Class II malocclusion: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  J F Tulloch; C Phillips; G Koch; W R Proffit
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 2.650

3.  Cephalometric evaluation of treatment effect on Class II, Division I malocclusions.

Authors:  S O Jakobsson
Journal:  Am J Orthod       Date:  1967-06

4.  A two-dimensional coordinate model for the quantification, description, analysis, prediction and simulation of craniofacial growth.

Authors:  G F Walker; C J Kowalski
Journal:  Growth       Date:  1971-09

5.  Headgear versus function regulator in the early treatment of Class II, division 1 malocclusion: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  J Ghafari; F S Shofer; U Jacobsson-Hunt; D L Markowitz; L L Laster
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.650

Review 6.  Anteroposterior skeletal and dental changes after early Class II treatment with bionators and headgear.

Authors:  S D Keeling; T T Wheeler; G J King; C W Garvan; D A Cohen; S Cabassa; S P McGorray; M G Taylor
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.650

7.  The effectiveness of Class II, division 1 treatment.

Authors:  K D O'Brien; R Robbins; K W Vig; P S Vig; H Shnorhokian; R Weyant
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 2.650

8.  A comparison of surgery and orthodontics in "borderline" adults with Class II, division 1 malocclusions.

Authors:  D W Cassidy; E G Herbosa; K S Rotskoff; L E Johnston
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 2.650

9.  The Probability Index.

Authors:  J F Gramling
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 2.650

10.  Configurational differences in six skeletal landmarks in surgically treated and nonsurgically treated Class II patients.

Authors:  A M Bollen; P P Hujoel
Journal:  Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg       Date:  1994
View more
  1 in total

1.  Comparison of surgical and non-surgical orthodontic treatment approaches on occlusal and cephalometric outcomes in patients with Class II Division I malocclusions.

Authors:  Sheila Daniels; Patrick Brady; Arya Daniels; Stacey Howes; Kyungsup Shin; Satheesh Elangovan; Veerasathpurush Allareddy
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 2.750

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.