Literature DB >> 22906001

Contextual task difficulty modulates stimulus discrimination: electrophysiological evidence for interaction between sensory and executive processes.

John R Fedota1, Craig G McDonald, Daniel M Roberts, Raja Parasuraman.   

Abstract

The occipital-temporal N1 component of the event-related potential (ERP) has previously been shown to index a stimulus discrimination process. However, the N1 has not consistently been shown to be sensitive to the difficulty of stimulus discrimination. Here, we manipulated the difficulty of stimulus discrimination by modulating the similarity between serially presented targets and nontargets. The same target stimulus was employed in both easy and difficult discrimination contexts, and these physically identical target stimuli elicited a larger N1 and smaller P3b in the difficult task context. Moreover, when targets were incorrectly categorized, N1 amplitude was diminished and a P3b was not elicited. These findings provide evidence that the N1 component reflects a sensory discrimination process that is modulated by executive control, and that this component can index discrimination errors when stimulus discrimination is difficult.
Copyright © 2012 Society for Psychophysiological Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22906001      PMCID: PMC3445805          DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2012.01455.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  41 in total

Review 1.  An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function.

Authors:  E K Miller; J D Cohen
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 12.449

2.  Attention and spatial selection: electrophysiological evidence for modulation by perceptual load.

Authors:  T C Handy; G R Mangun
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2000-01

3.  The visual N1 component as an index of a discrimination process.

Authors:  E K Vogel; S J Luck
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 4.  On the utility of P3 amplitude as a measure of processing capacity.

Authors:  A Kok
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 5.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain.

Authors:  Maurizio Corbetta; Gordon L Shulman
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 34.870

6.  Activity in primary visual cortex predicts performance in a visual detection task.

Authors:  D Ress; B T Backus; D J Heeger
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 24.884

7.  Effects of task difficulty on evoked gamma activity and ERPs in a visual discrimination task.

Authors:  Daniel Senkowski; Christoph S Herrmann
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.708

8.  Localizing visual discrimination processes in time and space.

Authors:  Jens-Max Hopf; Edward Vogel; Geoffrey Woodman; Hans-Jochen Heinze; Steven J Luck
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  The role of working memory in visual selective attention.

Authors:  J W de Fockert; G Rees; C D Frith; N Lavie
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-03-02       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 10.  Computational modelling of visual attention.

Authors:  L Itti; C Koch
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 34.870

View more
  4 in total

1.  Utility-based early modulation of processing distracting stimulus information.

Authors:  Mike Wendt; Aquiles Luna-Rodriguez; Thomas Jacobsen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  An ERP study on proactive and reactive response inhibition in individuals with schizotypy.

Authors:  Lu-Xia Jia; Xiao-Jing Qin; Ji-Fang Cui; Qi Zheng; Tian-Xiao Yang; Ya Wang; Raymond C K Chan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Description-based reappraisal regulate the emotion induced by erotic and neutral images in a Chinese population.

Authors:  Jiaxin Peng; Chen Qu; Ruolei Gu; Yue-Jia Luo
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Speed of human biological form and motion processing.

Authors:  George Buzzell; Laura Chubb; Ashley S Safford; James C Thompson; Craig G McDonald
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.