Literature DB >> 22775503

The spotlight of attention illuminates failed feature-based expectancies.

Jesse J Bengson1, Javier Lopez-Calderon, George R Mangun.   

Abstract

A well-replicated finding is that visual stimuli presented at an attended location are afforded a processing benefit in the form of speeded reaction times and increased accuracy (Mangun, ; Posner,). This effect has been described using a spotlight metaphor, in which all stimuli within the focus of spatial attention receive facilitated processing, irrespective of other stimulus parameters. However, the spotlight metaphor has been brought into question by a series of combined expectancy studies that demonstrated that the behavioral benefits of spatial attention are contingent on secondary feature-based expectancies (Kingstone,). The present work used an event-related potential (ERP) approach to reveal that the early neural signature of the spotlight of spatial attention is not sensitive to the validity of secondary feature-based expectancies.
Copyright © 2012 Society for Psychophysiological Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22775503      PMCID: PMC3399942          DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2012.01385.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychophysiology        ISSN: 0048-5772            Impact factor:   4.016


  21 in total

1.  The magical number 4 in short-term memory: a reconsideration of mental storage capacity.

Authors:  N Cowan
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 12.579

2.  A theory of visual attention.

Authors:  C Bundesen
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  An interactive race model of divided attention.

Authors:  J T Mordkoff; S Yantis
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Selective attention and the organization of visual information.

Authors:  J Duncan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1984-12

Review 5.  Is vision continuous with cognition? The case for cognitive impenetrability of visual perception.

Authors:  Z Pylyshyn
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 12.579

6.  Selective attention and performance with a multidimensional visual display.

Authors:  A Lambert; R Hockey
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Expecting different categories at different locations and spatial selective attention.

Authors:  A Lambert
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1987-02

8.  Selective attention to color and location: an analysis with event-related brain potentials.

Authors:  S A Hillyard; T F Münte
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1984-08

9.  Flexibility of attention between stimulus dimensions.

Authors:  G W Humphreys
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1981-09

10.  Individual working memory capacity is uniquely correlated with feature-based attention when combined with spatial attention.

Authors:  Jesse J Bengson; George R Mangun
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.199

View more
  6 in total

1.  Stimulus competition mediates the joint effects of spatial and feature-based attention.

Authors:  Alex L White; Martin Rolfs; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Neurophysiological evidence that perceptions of fluency produce mere exposure effects.

Authors:  P Andrew Leynes; Richard J Addante
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Attentional weights in vision as products of spatial and nonspatial components.

Authors:  Maria Nordfang; Camilla Staugaard; Claus Bundesen
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-06

4.  A critical role of the human hippocampus in an electrophysiological measure of implicit memory.

Authors:  Richard James Addante
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-01-04       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Spatial sampling in human visual cortex is modulated by both spatial and feature-based attention.

Authors:  Daniel Marten van Es; Jan Theeuwes; Tomas Knapen
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-12-07       Impact factor: 8.140

6.  Limited interactions between space- and feature-based attention in visually sparse displays.

Authors:  Guangsheng Liang; Miranda Scolari
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 2.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.