Literature DB >> 787009

Comparison of API and Minitek to Center for Disease Control methods for the biochemical characterization of anaerobes.

S L Hansen, B J Stewart.   

Abstract

Two commercially available micromethod multitest systems (API, Analytab Products, Inc., Minitek-Bioquest) were compared with conventional tests suggested by the Center for Disease Control for the identification of anaerobes. Anaerobiosis for the microsystems was achieved using GasPak system (BBL), A total of 175 anaerobes, including 158 clinical isolates and 17 reference strains, were used. Gram morphology, gas-liquid chromatography data, and biochemical reactions from the Center for Disease Control and Virginia Polytechnic Institute anaerobic manuals were used to identify the organisms. The Minitek system included a new anaerobe inoculum broth and two new disks, dextrose without nitrate and nitrate reductase disks. The percentage of correlation of 12 biochemicals using Minitek and 11 biochemicals using the API were compared with the Center for Disease Control reactions. The percentage of correlation of both positive and negative reactions with the API anaerobic strip ranged from 70.8 to 99.4% and with the Minitek from 97.1 to 100%. The microsystems were also evaluated as to the ease of use, adaptabilty to a clinical laboratory, time, and cost.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1976        PMID: 787009      PMCID: PMC274441          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.4.3.227-231.1976

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  6 in total

1.  Comparison of three procedures for biochemical testing of anaerobic bacteria.

Authors:  H B Moore; V L Sutter; S M Finegold
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1975-01       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Modification of the Minitek Miniaturized Differentiation System for characterization of anaerobic bacteria.

Authors:  D Stargel; F S Thompson; S E Phillips; G L Lombard; V R Dowell
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Micromethod system for identification of anaerobic bacteria.

Authors:  S E Starr; F S Thompson; V R Dowell; A Balows
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1973-05

4.  Anaerobic infections. 1.

Authors:  S L Gorbach; J G Bartlett
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1974-05-23       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Antibiotic disc susceptibility tests for rapid presumptive identification of Gram-negative anaerobic bacilli.

Authors:  V L Sutter; S M Finegold
Journal:  Appl Microbiol       Date:  1971-01

6.  Management of anaerobic infections.

Authors:  S M Finegold; J G Bartlett; A W Chow; D J Flora; S L Gorbach; E J Harder; F P Tally
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 25.391

  6 in total
  20 in total

1.  Comparison of Minitek and conventional methods for the biochemical characterization of oral streptococci.

Authors:  J A Setterstrom; A Gross; R S Stanko
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Nose, throat, and fecal flora of beagle dogs housed in "locked" or "open" environments.

Authors:  E Balish; D Cleven; J Brown; C E Yale
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1977-08       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  API and Minitek systems in identification of clinical isolates of anaerobic gram-negative bacilli and Clostridium species.

Authors:  C W Hanson; R Cassorla; W J Martin
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Identification of viridans streptococci on the Minitek Miniaturised Differentiation System.

Authors:  Y Holloway; M Schaareman; J Dankert
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Urease production from clinical isolates of beta-hemolytic Escherichia coli.

Authors:  R J Lesher; W H Jones
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Clinical evaluation of a simple, rapid procedure for the presumptive identification of anaerobic bacteria.

Authors:  J W Holland; S M Gagnet; S A Lewis; L R Stauffer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1977-04       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Use of the Minitek system for characterizing lactobacilli.

Authors:  S E Gilliland; M L Speck
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Comparative evaluation of RapID ANA and API 20 A for identification of anaerobic bacteria.

Authors:  P Summanen; H Jousimies-Somer
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 3.267

9.  Comparative evaluation of three identification systems for anaerobes.

Authors:  P R Murray; C J Weber; A C Niles
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Evaluation of the biomed bacteroides IF kit for identification of Bacteroides fragilis group strains.

Authors:  A Vege; T Hofstad; A Sawicka-Grzelak; H Pituch; F Meisel-Mikolajczyk
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 3.267

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.