Literature DB >> 7868115

Identifying chromosomal fragile sites from individuals: a multinomial statistical model.

U Böhm1, P F Dahm, B F McAllister, I F Greenbaum.   

Abstract

The inability to identify fragile sites from data for single individuals remains the major obstacle to determining whether these chromosomal loci are predisposed to cancer-causing and evolutionary rearrangements. We describe a novel statistical model that is amenable to data from single individuals and that establishes site-specific chromosomal breakage as nonrandom with respect to the distribution of total breakage. Our method tests incrementally smaller subsets of the data for homogeneity under a multinomial model that assigns equal probabilities to a maximal set of nonfragile sites and unrestricted probabilities to the remaining fragile sites with significantly higher numbers of breaks. We show how standardized Pearson's chi-square (X2) and likelihood-ratio (G2) statistics can be appropriately used to measure goodness-of-fit for sparse contingency (individual-based) data in this model. A sample application of this approach indicates extensive variation in fragile sites among individuals and marked differences in fragile-site inferences from pooled as opposed to per-individual data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7868115     DOI: 10.1007/bf00225189

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Genet        ISSN: 0340-6717            Impact factor:   4.132


  30 in total

1.  Multiple common fragile sites are expressed in the genome of the laboratory rat.

Authors:  T J Robinson; F F Elder
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.316

2.  Two methods for measuring the non-randomness of chromosome abnormalities.

Authors:  M De Braekeleer; B Smith
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 1.670

3.  Chi-squared tests with small numbers.

Authors:  C A Smith
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 1.670

4.  Increased fragile sites and sister chromatid exchanges in bone marrow and peripheral blood of young cigarette smokers.

Authors:  C S Kao-Shan; R L Fine; J Whang-Peng; E C Lee; B A Chabner
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1987-12-01       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 5.  Chromosomal fragile sites and cancer-specific rearrangements.

Authors:  M M Le Beau
Journal:  Blood       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  A method for testing the nonrandomness of chromosomal breakpoints.

Authors:  J J Tai; C D Hou; S Wang-Wuu; C H Wang; S Y Leu; K D Wuu
Journal:  Cytogenet Cell Genet       Date:  1993

7.  Heritable fragile sites in cancer.

Authors:  M M LeBeau; J D Rowley
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1984 Apr 12-18       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Cancer chromosome breakpoints and common fragile sites induced by aphidicolin.

Authors:  F Hecht; T W Glover
Journal:  Cancer Genet Cytogenet       Date:  1984-10

9.  Constitutive fragile sites and cancer.

Authors:  J J Yunis; A L Soreng
Journal:  Science       Date:  1984-12-07       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Familial and individual variation in chromosome fragility.

Authors:  D Smeets; A Verhagen; T Hustinx
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 2.433

View more
  5 in total

1.  Fragile sites in human and Macaca fascicularis chromosomes are breakpoints in chromosome evolution.

Authors:  A Ruiz-Herrera; M Ponsà; F García; J Egozcue; M García
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.239

2.  Expression and identification of folate-sensitive fragile sites in British Suffolk sheep (Ovis aries).

Authors:  Ahmad Ali; Muhammad Abdullah; Masroor Ellahi Babar; Khalid Javed; Asif Nadeem
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.166

3.  Susceptibility of heterochromatin to aphidicolin-induced chromosomal breakage.

Authors:  A M Dominguez; S A Smith; I F Greenbaum
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 4.132

4.  Chromosomal instability in Afrotheria: fragile sites, evolutionary breakpoints and phylogenetic inference from genome sequence assemblies.

Authors:  Aurora Ruiz-Herrera; Terence J Robinson
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 3.260

5.  Chromosomal bands affected by acute oil exposure and DNA repair errors.

Authors:  Gemma Monyarch; Fernanda de Castro Reis; Jan-Paul Zock; Jesús Giraldo; Francisco Pozo-Rodríguez; Ana Espinosa; Gema Rodríguez-Trigo; Hector Verea; Gemma Castaño-Vinyals; Federico P Gómez; Josep M Antó; Maria Dolors Coll; Joan Albert Barberà; Carme Fuster
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.