Literature DB >> 7866847

The posterior pelvic pain provocation test in pregnant women.

H C Ostgaard1, G Zetherström, E Roos-Hansson.   

Abstract

This study was done to evaluate a new, simple, non-invasive pain provocation test as an acid to differentiate between low-back and posterior pelvic pain in pregnant women. The test was performed on 72 pregnant women at various stages of pregnancy with or without low-back or posterior pelvic pain. The study was conducted by two physiotherapists with special interest in back pain in pregnancy at a normal antenatal clinic. The test was easy to learn, perform and interpret and was applicable throughout pregnancy. There was a strong correlation between a positive test answer and a history of posterior pelvic pain (P < 0.01, chi-square). There were no side-effects. The test was highly specific and had a high positive prediction value for posterior pelvic pain and a high negative prediction value for low-back pain among pregnant women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7866847     DOI: 10.1007/bf02226575

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  9 in total

1.  Obstetrical and gynecological back and pelvic pains, especially those contracted during pregnancy.

Authors:  J WALDE
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl       Date:  1962

2.  Prevalence of back pain in pregnancy.

Authors:  H C Ostgaard; G B Andersson; K Karlsson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Recognizing specific characteristics of nonspecific low back pain.

Authors:  T N Bernard; W H Kirkaldy-Willis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Serum relaxin and pelvic pain of pregnancy.

Authors:  A H MacLennan; R Nicolson; R C Green; M Bath
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-08-02       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Movements of the sacroiliac joints. A roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis.

Authors:  B Sturesson; G Selvik; A Udén
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Backache in pregnancy.

Authors:  M J Mantle; R M Greenwood; H L Currey
Journal:  Rheumatol Rehabil       Date:  1977-05

7.  Intertester reliability for selected clinical tests of the sacroiliac joint.

Authors:  N A Potter; J M Rothstein
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1985-11

8.  Low-back pain in pregnancy.

Authors:  A Fast; D Shapiro; E J Ducommun; L W Friedmann; T Bouklas; Y Floman
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Reduction of back and posterior pelvic pain in pregnancy.

Authors:  H C Ostgaard; G Zetherström; E Roos-Hansson; B Svanberg
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1994-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

  9 in total
  28 in total

Review 1.  Is pregnancy related pelvic girdle pain associated with altered kinematic, kinetic and motor control of the pelvis? A systematic review.

Authors:  Daniela Aldabe; Stephan Milosavljevic; Melanie Dawn Bussey
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Pregnancy-related low back pain.

Authors:  P Katonis; A Kampouroglou; A Aggelopoulos; K Kakavelakis; S Lykoudis; A Makrigiannakis; K Alpantaki
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 0.471

3.  Effects of acupuncture and stabilising exercises as adjunct to standard treatment in pregnant women with pelvic girdle pain: randomised single blind controlled trial.

Authors:  Helen Elden; Lars Ladfors; Monika Fagevik Olsen; Hans-Christian Ostgaard; Henrik Hagberg
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-03-18

4.  Relations between pregnancy-related low back pain, pelvic floor activity and pelvic floor dysfunction.

Authors:  Annelies L Pool-Goudzwaard; Marijke C P H Slieker ten Hove; Mark E Vierhout; Paul H Mulder; Jan J M Pool; Chris J Snijders; Rob Stoeckart
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2005-04-01

5.  Prognostic factors for recovery from postpartum pelvic girdle pain.

Authors:  Nina K Vøllestad; Britt Stuge
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  Pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain (PPP), I: Terminology, clinical presentation, and prevalence.

Authors:  W H Wu; O G Meijer; K Uegaki; J M A Mens; J H van Dieën; P I J M Wuisman; H C Ostgaard
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-08-27       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Metabolic disturbances identified by SPECT-CT in patients with a clinical diagnosis of sacroiliac joint incompetence.

Authors:  Mel Cusi; Jennifer Saunders; Hans Van der Wall; Ignac Fogelman
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Pelvic girdle pain--associations between risk factors in early pregnancy and disability or pain intensity in late pregnancy: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Hilde Stendal Robinson; Marit B Veierød; Anne Marit Mengshoel; Nina K Vøllestad
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Posterior pelvic pain provocation test is negative in patients with lumbar herniated discs.

Authors:  Annelie Gutke; Eva Roos Hansson; Gunilla Zetherström; Hans Christian Ostgaard
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-04-24       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Self-administered tests as a screening procedure for pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain.

Authors:  Monika Fagevik Olsén; Annelie Gutke; Helen Elden; Charlotte Nordenman; Lina Fabricius; Melissa Gravesen; Anette Lind; Gunilla Kjellby-Wendt
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-03-28       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.