Literature DB >> 7862976

Cardiac echo-planar MR imaging: comparison of single- and multiple-shot techniques.

D R Wetter1, G C McKinnon, J F Debatin, G K von Schulthess.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the quality of cardiac images acquired with two-and four-shot echo-planar imaging (EPI) with that of images acquired with single-shot EPI.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Single-, two-, and four-shot EPI was performed to obtain axial images that traversed both cardiac ventricles. The subjects were 10 healthy men whose ages ranged from 22 to 38 years (mean, 27 years). The multiple-shot EPI data were acquired in snapshot (sequential) and cardiac-gated (non-sequential) modes. Image quality was compared by evaluation of the depiction of cardiac structures and analysis of signal intensity, contrast, and signal homogeneity.
RESULTS: Multiple-shot EPI depicted the coronary and internal mammary arteries better than did single-shot EPI (P < .05). Intraventricular signal intensity was more homogeneous on multiple-shot images (P < .005). Cardiac-gated acquisition resulted in less image blurring and allowed acquisition of more phases per RR interval.
CONCLUSION: Multiple-shot EPI rendered higher quality images than did single-shot EPI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7862976     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.194.3.7862976

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  8 in total

1.  Ghost artifact cancellation using phased array processing.

Authors:  P Kellman; E R McVeigh
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  In vitro determination of cardiac ventricular volumes using MRI at 1.0 T in a porcine heart model.

Authors:  J A Koch; L W Poll; E Godehardt; B Korbmacher; G Jung; U Mödder
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Phased array ghost elimination.

Authors:  Peter Kellman; Elliot R McVeigh
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.044

Review 4.  Advances in vascular echoplanar imaging.

Authors:  J F Debatin; D A Leung; S Wildermuth; D Holtz; G C McKinnon
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  1995 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 5.  Ultra-high-speed MR imaging.

Authors:  C P Davis; G C McKinnon; J F Debatin; G K von Schulthess
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  Magnetic resonance imaging in congenital heart disease in children.

Authors:  A E Schlesinger; R J Hernandez
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  1996

7.  Technical note--approach to myocardial perfusion with echo planar imaging.

Authors:  J F Debatin; G C McKinnon; G K von Schulthess
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 8.  Current clinical relevance of cardiovascular magnetic resonance and its relationship to nuclear cardiology.

Authors:  E E van der Wall; J Bax
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.872

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.