Literature DB >> 7862920

Individual differences in sugar intake predict the locomotor response to acute and repeated amphetamine administration.

T L Sills1, F J Vaccarino.   

Abstract

Rats exhibit profound individual differences in their propensity to ingest sugar and in their locomotor response to AMP. Intrinsic variation in the responsiveness of mesolimbic dopamine mechanisms has been suggested to account for these individual differences. In light of this overlap, it might be expected that individual differences in one behavior would predict individual differences in the other. The present study determined whether individual differences in sugar intake would predict individual differences in the locomotor response to AMP. Male Wistar rats were divided into low and high feeders based on a median split of their sugar intake in response to saline administration and were subsequently tested for their locomotor response to either 1.0 or 1.75 mg/kg AMP in experiment 1. High sugar feeders exhibited significantly more locomotion than low sugar feeders in response to 1.75 mg/kg AMP. This difference was observed immediately after injection and continued for approximately 90 min. There was no difference between the two groups in their locomotor response to 1.0 mg/kg AMP. In experiment 2, rats receiving 1.0 mg/kg AMP in experiment 1 were tested for the development of behavioral sensitization with repeated AMP administrations. Rats were administered 1.0 mg/kg AMP across 5 test days, interspersed with days in which they received AMP treatment in their home cages to minimize conditioning effects. High sugar feeders exhibited greater behavioral sensitization than low sugar feeders with repeated AMP administration. Starting on test day 3, high sugar feeders exhibited significantly greater AMP-induced locomotor activity than low sugar feeders.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7862920     DOI: 10.1007/bf02244864

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  58 in total

1.  Tail pinch induces eating in sated rats which appears to depend on nigrostriatal dopamine.

Authors:  S M Antelman; H Szechtman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1975-08-29       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Stress-induced enhancement of dopamine and acetylcholine release in limbic structures: role of corticosterone.

Authors:  A Imperato; S Puglisi-Allegra; P Casolini; A Zocchi; L Angelucci
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  1989-06-20       Impact factor: 4.432

3.  Long-term administration of d-amphetamine: progressive augmentation of motor activity and stereotypy.

Authors:  D S Segal; A J Mandell
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1974 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.533

4.  The propensity for nonregulatory ingestive behavior is related to differences in dopamine systems: behavioral and biochemical evidence.

Authors:  G Mittleman; E Castañeda; T E Robinson; E S Valenstein
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 1.912

5.  The effect of dopamine receptor blockade on the development of sensitization to the locomotor activating effects of amphetamine and morphine.

Authors:  P Vezina; J Stewart
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1989-10-09       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  Corticosterone levels determine individual vulnerability to amphetamine self-administration.

Authors:  P V Piazza; S Maccari; J M Deminière; M Le Moal; P Mormède; H Simon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1991-03-15       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Individual differences in the feeding effects of amphetamine: role of nucleus accumbens dopamine and circadian factors.

Authors:  T L Sills; J P Baird; F J Vaccarino
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 8.  Enduring changes in brain and behavior produced by chronic amphetamine administration: a review and evaluation of animal models of amphetamine psychosis.

Authors:  T E Robinson; J B Becker
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 3.252

9.  Sensitization and individual differences to IP amphetamine, cocaine, or caffeine following repeated intracranial amphetamine infusions.

Authors:  M S Hooks; G H Jones; B J Liem; J B Justice
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.533

10.  Differential effects of mesocortical, mesolimbic, and mesostriatal dopamine depletion on spontaneous, conditioned, and drug-induced locomotor activity.

Authors:  G H Jones; T W Robbins
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.533

View more
  9 in total

1.  Consumption of palatable food decreases the anorectic effects of serotonergic, but not dopaminergic drugs in baboons.

Authors:  Richard W Foltin
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2011-04-13

Review 2.  The behavioral pharmacology of anorexigenic drugs in nonhuman primates: 30 years of progress.

Authors:  Richard W Foltin
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.293

3.  Food restriction enhances the central rewarding effect of abused drugs.

Authors:  S Cabeza de Vaca; K D Carr
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Multiple chemical sensitivity and idiopathic environmental intolerance (part one).

Authors:  Mitsuyasu Watanabe; Hideki Tonori; Yoshiharu Aizawa
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.674

Review 5.  Individual differences and social influences on the neurobehavioral pharmacology of abused drugs.

Authors:  M T Bardo; J L Neisewander; T H Kelly
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 25.468

Review 6.  Dopamine ups and downs in vulnerability to addictions: a neurodevelopmental model.

Authors:  Marco Leyton; Paul Vezina
Journal:  Trends Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 14.819

Review 7.  Feeding, drug abuse, and the sensitization of reward by metabolic need.

Authors:  K D Carr
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 3.996

8.  The biological, social and clinical bases of drug addiction: commentary and debate.

Authors:  J Altman; B J Everitt; S Glautier; A Markou; D Nutt; R Oretti; G D Phillips; T W Robbins
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  The role of CYP2D in rat brain in methamphetamine-induced striatal dopamine and serotonin release and behavioral sensitization.

Authors:  Marlaina R Stocco; Ahmed A El-Sherbeni; Bin Zhao; Maria Novalen; Rachel F Tyndale
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 4.530

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.