Literature DB >> 1448477

Sensitization and individual differences to IP amphetamine, cocaine, or caffeine following repeated intracranial amphetamine infusions.

M S Hooks1, G H Jones, B J Liem, J B Justice.   

Abstract

Rats that have a high locomotor response to novelty (HR) sensitize more readily to IP-administered amphetamine than rats with a low locomotor response (LR) to novelty. This experiment compared sensitization in HR and LR rats following amphetamine (3.0 micrograms/side for 5 days) infused bilaterally into either the nucleus accumbens (NACC), ventral tegmental area (VTA), or the medial frontal cortex (MFC). The subsequent locomotor response to IP-administered d-amphetamine sulfate (1 mg/kg), cocaine HCl (15 mg/kg), and caffeine benzoate (20 mg/kg) was also examined. No differences were observed between HR and LR rats following amphetamine infusion into either the MFC, NACC, or VTA. However, HR rats showed greater locomotor activity compared to LR rats following either IP amphetamine, cocaine, or caffeine for subjects cannulated in the NACC, MFC, or the VTA. Repeated infusions of amphetamine into the VTA increased the locomotor response to both IP amphetamine and cocaine, but not to IP caffeine, while repeated infusions of amphetamine into the NACC or MFC had no effect on locomotor response to any drug subsequently administered IP. The results support previous findings that changes induced by intra-VTA infusions, but not intra-NACC or MFC infusions, of amphetamine induce sensitization to IP-administered amphetamine and cocaine. Findings from the present experiment indicate the ability of the dopamine cell body region, but not the dopamine terminal fields, to produce locomotor sensitization to amphetamine and cocaine. The results from the present experiment also indicate the lack of localization to one of studied regions of individual differences.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1448477     DOI: 10.1016/0091-3057(92)90413-a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav        ISSN: 0091-3057            Impact factor:   3.533


  28 in total

1.  The mesopontine rostromedial tegmental nucleus: an integrative modulator of the reward system.

Authors:  Heather N Lavezzi; Daniel S Zahm
Journal:  Basal Ganglia       Date:  2011-11

2.  Response to novelty and cocaine stimulant effects: lack of stability across environments in female Swiss mice.

Authors:  Laura Nyssen; Christian Brabant; Vincent Didone; Etienne Quertemont
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Amphetamine modifies ethanol intake of psychosocially stressed male rats.

Authors:  Larissa A Pohorecky; April Sweeny
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 3.533

4.  Appetitive sensitization by amphetamine does not reduce its ability to produce conditioned taste aversion to saccharin.

Authors:  John Scott-Railton; Gretchen Arnold; Paul Vezina
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2006-10-04       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 5.  Behavioral functions of the mesolimbic dopaminergic system: an affective neuroethological perspective.

Authors:  Antonio Alcaro; Robert Huber; Jaak Panksepp
Journal:  Brain Res Rev       Date:  2007-08-21

6.  Nucleus accumbens lesions modulate the effects of methylphenidate.

Authors:  Adam Podet; Min J Lee; Alan C Swann; Nachum Dafny
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 4.077

Review 7.  Responses to novelty and vulnerability to cocaine addiction: contribution of a multi-symptomatic animal model.

Authors:  David Belin; Véronique Deroche-Gamonet
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 6.915

8.  Regulation of netrin-1 receptors by amphetamine in the adult brain.

Authors:  L Yetnikoff; C Labelle-Dumais; C Flores
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2007-10-10       Impact factor: 3.590

9.  Activation of afferents to the ventral tegmental area in response to acute amphetamine: a double-labelling study.

Authors:  Joyce Colussi-Mas; Stefanie Geisler; Luc Zimmer; Daniel S Zahm; Anne Bérod
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.386

10.  Prediction of individual differences in fear response by novelty seeking, and disruption of contextual fear memory reconsolidation by ketamine.

Authors:  Florian Duclot; Iara Perez-Taboada; Katherine N Wright; Mohamed Kabbaj
Journal:  Neuropharmacology       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 5.250

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.