Literature DB >> 3964423

The propensity for nonregulatory ingestive behavior is related to differences in dopamine systems: behavioral and biochemical evidence.

G Mittleman, E Castañeda, T E Robinson, E S Valenstein.   

Abstract

Previous research has shown that animals predisposed to eat and drink in response to electrical stimulation of the lateral hypothalamus (ESLH) are similarly predisposed to drink excessively when tested for schedule-induced polydipsia. The eating and drinking elicited by both experimental paradigms appears to be unrelated to homeostatic need and has been called nonregulatory ingestive behavior. In this study, the relation between properties of dopaminergic neural systems and the predisposition to exhibit nonregulatory ingestive behavior was investigated. It was found that rats that eat and drink during ESLH show greater behavioral sensitization to a series of amphetamine injections that those that do not exhibit ingestive behavior during ESLH. In addition, footshock stress produced a greater increase in forebrain dopamine utilization in rats that engaged in nonregulatory ingestive behavior. This evidence is consistent with the hypothesis that there are individual differences in the responsiveness of forebrain dopamine systems that are related to the behavioral predisposition to exhibit nonregulatory ingestive behavior.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3964423     DOI: 10.1037//0735-7044.100.2.213

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 0735-7044            Impact factor:   1.912


  7 in total

Review 1.  Applications of schedule-induced polydipsia in rodents for the study of an excessive ethanol intake phenotype.

Authors:  Matthew M Ford
Journal:  Alcohol       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 2.405

Review 2.  Food reinforcement and eating: a multilevel analysis.

Authors:  Leonard H Epstein; John J Leddy; Jennifer L Temple; Myles S Faith
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 17.737

3.  Aversion instead of preference learning indicated by nicotine place conditioning in rats.

Authors:  D E Jorenby; R E Steinpreis; J E Sherman; T B Baker
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Poor inhibitory control and neurochemical differences in high compulsive drinker rats selected by schedule-induced polydipsia.

Authors:  Margarita Moreno; Valeria Edith Gutiérrez-Ferre; Luis Ruedas; Leticia Campa; Cristina Suñol; Pilar Flores
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Basal local cerebral glucose utilization is not altered after behavioral sensitization to quinpirole.

Authors:  Toni L Richards; Thomas L Pazdernik; Beth Levant
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2007-10-18       Impact factor: 3.046

6.  Differences in the structure of drinking, cart expression and dopamine turnover between polydipsic and non polydipsic rats in the quinpirole model of psychotic polydipsia.

Authors:  Chiara Schepisi; Silvia Cianci; Gaurav Bedse; Jin Fu; Silvana Gaetani; Paolo Nencini
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Individual differences in sugar intake predict the locomotor response to acute and repeated amphetamine administration.

Authors:  T L Sills; F J Vaccarino
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.530

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.