Literature DB >> 7861912

Durational effects in final lengthening, gapping, and contrastive stress.

R Berkovits1.   

Abstract

Lengthening in utterance-final position and in contrastive stress was examined in Hebrew, focusing on the distribution of the durational effect across syllables and within the final syllable. Initially-stressed and finally-stressed bisyllabic key words were read in sentence-final versus nonfinal position, and in contrastive stress versus nonstressed constructions. The results were compared with data from an earlier study of verb gapping. Contrastive stress showed a smaller effect than final lengthening and verb gapping, consistent with the claim that other acoustic parameters are more prominently involved in this process. Utterance-final lengthening and verb gapping principally affected the final syllable regardless of stress, whereas contrastive stress primarily lengthened the stressed syllable. The pattern of progressively greater lengthening within the utterance-final syllable, previously found for stressed syllables, applied to unstressed syllables as well. The finding that target syllables in sentence-final position are characterized by progressive lengthening, unlike those in contrastive stress and gapping, supports the suggestion that utterance-final lengthening is a reflection of deceleration at the end of motor activity. Durational measures of individual syllables within the key word, and of segments in addition to the vocalic portion of the final syllable, reveal differences in the acoustic implementation of different lengthening processes.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7861912     DOI: 10.1177/002383099403700302

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lang Speech        ISSN: 0023-8309            Impact factor:   1.500


  9 in total

1.  How far, how long: on the temporal scope of prosodic boundary effects.

Authors:  Dani Byrd; Jelena Krivokapić; Sungbok Lee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Locality interactions with prominence in determining the scope of phrasal lengthening.

Authors:  Dani Byrd; Daylen Riggs
Journal:  J Int Phon Assoc       Date:  2008-08-01

Review 3.  Gestural coordination at prosodic boundaries and its role for prosodic structure and speech planning processes.

Authors:  Jelena Krivokapić
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  The role of prominence in determining the scope of boundary-related lengthening in Greek.

Authors:  Argyro Katsika
Journal:  J Phon       Date:  2016-02-16

5.  Three-year-olds' production of Australian English phonemic vowel length as a function of prosodic context.

Authors:  Ivan Yuen; Felicity Cox; Katherine Demuth
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Experimental and theoretical advances in prosody: A review.

Authors:  Michael Wagner; Duane G Watson
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  2010-01-01

7.  The extent and degree of utterance-final word lengthening in spontaneous speech from 10 languages.

Authors:  Frank Seifart; Jan Strunk; Swintha Danielsen; Iren Hartmann; Brigitte Pakendorf; Søren Wichmann; Alena Witzlack-Makarevich; Nikolaus P Himmelmann; Balthasar Bickel
Journal:  Linguist Vanguard       Date:  2021-02-09

Review 8.  Voice modulatory cues to structure across languages and species.

Authors:  Theresa Matzinger; W Tecumseh Fitch
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  How listeners weight acoustic cues to intonational phrase boundaries.

Authors:  Xiaohong Yang; Xiangrong Shen; Weijun Li; Yufang Yang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.