Literature DB >> 24606283

Three-year-olds' production of Australian English phonemic vowel length as a function of prosodic context.

Ivan Yuen1, Felicity Cox1, Katherine Demuth1.   

Abstract

Durational contrasts are used not only to signal phrasal boundaries and focused constituents, but also to make phonemic distinctions. Boundary and focus effects can therefore interact with phonemic length contrasts, presenting a challenge for learners. Boundary effects are most clearly seen in the syllable rhyme, where the nucleus and coda are longer in utterance-final compared to utterance-medial position, the magnitude of lengthening diminishing leftward from the end of the word. In the case of focus, where the nucleus and coda are also lengthened, the magnitude of lengthening diminishes rightwards toward the end of the word. The goal of this paper was therefore to compare productions of the phonemic vowel length contrast /ɐː/ vs /ɐ/ in adults and 3-yr-old children learning Australian English in the face of competing demands from boundary and focus lengthening. The results showed that the children maintain the /ɐː/ vs /ɐ/ contrast across prosodic contexts. They are also able to implement an adult-like pattern of boundary-related lengthening, but are still developing focus-related lengthening. The findings suggest that these 3-yr-olds have good command of the phonemic vowel length contrast, but are still fine-tuning language-specific aspects of temporal organization (i.e., the vowel-coda trading relationship) within the rhyme.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24606283      PMCID: PMC4042502          DOI: 10.1121/1.4864292

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  17 in total

1.  American and Swedish children's acquisition of vowel duration: effects of vowel identity and final stop voicing.

Authors:  Eugene H Buder; Carol Stoel-Gammon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Vowel systems of normally developing and phonologically disordered children.

Authors:  C Stoel-Gammon; P B Herrington
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.346

3.  Segmental durations in the vicinity of prosodic phrase boundaries.

Authors:  C W Wightman; S Shattuck-Hufnagel; M Ostendorf; P J Price
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Linguistic uses of segmental duration in English: acoustic and perceptual evidence.

Authors:  D H Klatt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Rhythmic units and syntactic units in production and perception.

Authors:  I Lehiste
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1973-11       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The effect of position in utterance on speech segment duration in English.

Authors:  D K Oller
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1973-11       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  On nucleus component durations.

Authors:  J R Bernard
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  1970 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.500

8.  Durational effects in final lengthening, gapping, and contrastive stress.

Authors:  R Berkovits
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  1994 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.500

9.  Duration as a cue to the perception of a phrase boundary.

Authors:  D R Scott
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  The acquisition of nuclei: a longitudinal analysis of phonological vowel length in three German-speaking children.

Authors:  Margaret M Kehoe; Conxita Lleó
Journal:  J Child Lang       Date:  2003-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.