Literature DB >> 27407554

Endopyelotomy - a Minimally Invasive Surgical Option for Pelvi-ureteric Junction Obstruction: a Study Of 34 Cases.

A A Pradhan1, Rajeev Sood2, P Madhusoodanan3, A S Sandhu2, S K Gupta4, Anil Kumar5.   

Abstract

We performed antegrade endopyelotomy in 34 cases in the last 2½ years. In all cases standardized antegrade percutaneous method was used. A single guide wire and a cold knife were used to perform the endopyelotomy. Nephrostomy tube was retained for 48 hours and the repair stented for 6 weeks. Patients were followed up at 3 months, 6 months and 1 year post-operatively for subjective improvement and objectively by DTPA scans/IVU and ultrasound. The population included 2 bilateral cases, one horseshoe kidney and 3 children. The patient's age ranged from 9-59 years, average 32 years. There were 21 males and 13 females. 28 renal units were primary and 8 were secondary pelviureteric junction (PUJ) obstruction. Follow up period was 3-28 months. Most cases had significant symptomatic and functional recovery postoperatively. Five cases presented with urinary tract infection, which regressed after treatment. At 3(rd) month postoperatively the DTPA/IVU scan was equivocal in 7 cases. In these, a RGP was done which in every case showed a patent PUJ. In 5 cases that were still symptomatic, 6-8 weeks of further stenting produced symptom regression. Two cases failed and needed revision, one by open pyeloplasty and the other by endopyelotomy. Our success rate overall in these cases followed upto 1 year post operatively is 91.6%. We conclude that endopyelotomy is successful across a wide spectrum of cases.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endopyelotomy; Pelvi-ureteric junction

Year:  2011        PMID: 27407554      PMCID: PMC4923617          DOI: 10.1016/S0377-1237(03)80145-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India        ISSN: 0377-1237


  14 in total

1.  Obstruction and recanalization of the ureter during embryonic development.

Authors:  A Alcaraz; F Vinaixa; A Tejedo-Mateu; M M Forés; V Gotzens; C A Mestres; J Oliveira; P Carretero
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 2.  Crossing vessels. Endourologic implications.

Authors:  M Gupta; A D Smith
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 2.241

Review 3.  Endopyelotomy. Prognostic factors and patient selection.

Authors:  P J Van Cangh; S Nesa
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 2.241

4.  Ureteropelvic invagination procedure for endopyelotomy (Gelet technique): review of 51 consecutive cases.

Authors:  M Combe; A Gelet; A F Abdelrahim; J G Lopez; M Dawahra; X Martin; J M Marechal; J M Dubernard
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 2.942

5.  Vessels around the ureteropelvic junction: significance and imaging by conventional radiology.

Authors:  P J Van Cangh; S Nesa; M Galeon; B Tombal; F X Wese; A N Dardenne; R Opsomer; F Lorge
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 2.942

6.  Endopyelotomy.

Authors:  G S Karlin; A D Smith
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 2.241

7.  Optimum duration of splinting after endopyelotomy.

Authors:  R Kumar; R Kapoor; A Mandhani; A Kumar; R Ahlawat
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 8.  Open surgical exploration after failed endopyelotomy: a 12-year perspective.

Authors:  M Gupta; O L Tuncay; A D Smith
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Endoureteropyelotomy: percutaneous treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction.

Authors:  P J Van Cangh; J L Jorion; F X Wese; R J Opsomer
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Endopyelotomy: comparison of ureteroscopic retrograde and antegrade percutaneous techniques.

Authors:  I Meretyk; S Meretyk; R V Clayman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 7.450

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.