Literature DB >> 7851324

A two-stage validation study for determining sensitivity and specificity.

T D Tosteson1, L Titus-Ernstoff, J A Baron, M R Karagas.   

Abstract

A two-stage procedure for estimating sensitivity and specificity is described. The procedure is developed in the context of a validation study for self-reported atypical nevi, a potentially useful measure in the study of risk factors for malignant melanoma. The first stage consists of a sample of N individuals classified only by the test measure. The second stage is a subsample of size m, stratified according the information collected in the first stage, in which the presence of atypical nevi is determined by clinical examination. Using missing data methods for contingency tables, maximum likelihood estimators for the joint distribution of the test measure and the "gold standard" clinical evaluation are presented, along with efficient estimators for the sensitivity and specificity. Asymptotic coefficients of variation are computed to compare alternative sampling strategies for the second stage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7851324      PMCID: PMC1566548          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.94102s811

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  6 in total

1.  Prevalence of common and dysplastic naevi in a Swedish population.

Authors:  A Augustsson; U Stierner; M Suurküla; I Rosdahl
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 9.302

2.  Reliability of interviewer and subject assessments of nevus counts in a study of melanoma.

Authors:  S D Walter; L D Marrett; C Hertzman
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  Self-reports of mole counts and cutaneous malignant melanoma in women: methodological issues and risk of disease.

Authors:  C Bain; G A Colditz; W C Willett; M J Stampfer; A Green; B R Bronstein; M C Mihm; B Rosner; C H Hennekens; F E Speizer
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Common and dysplastic naevi as risk factors for cutaneous malignant melanoma in a Swedish population.

Authors:  A Augustsson; U Stierner; I Rosdahl; M Suurküla
Journal:  Acta Derm Venereol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.437

5.  Assessment of diagnostic tests when disease verification is subject to selection bias.

Authors:  C B Begg; R A Greenes
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Cutaneous factors related to the risk of malignant melanoma.

Authors:  V Beral; S Evans; H Shaw; G Milton
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 9.302

  6 in total
  3 in total

1.  On Estimating Diagnostic Accuracy From Studies With Multiple Raters and Partial Gold Standard Evaluation.

Authors:  Paul S Albert; Lori E Dodd
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2008-03-01       Impact factor: 5.033

2.  Estimating the agreement and diagnostic accuracy of two diagnostic tests when one test is conducted on only a subsample of specimens.

Authors:  Hormuzd A Katki; Yan Li; David W Edelstein; Philip E Castle
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-12-04       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Two-Phase Sampling Designs for Data Validation in Settings with Covariate Measurement Error and Continuous Outcome.

Authors:  Gustavo Amorim; Ran Tao; Sarah Lotspeich; Pamela A Shaw; Thomas Lumley; Bryan E Shepherd
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 2.175

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.