Literature DB >> 2066743

Reliability of interviewer and subject assessments of nevus counts in a study of melanoma.

S D Walter1, L D Marrett, C Hertzman.   

Abstract

Several types of data are presented concerning the reliability of counting or estimating the density of nevi (moles), a major risk factor for melanoma, using methods typically employed in epidemiologic studies. First, interviewer-derived counts of nevi on the arm produced estimates of inter-observer, inter-subject, temporal and random variability, and their interactions. Second, interviewer-derived arm counts and respondent self-reports of whole body nevus density were compared. Finally, we compared male and female cases and controls with respect to their reported rates of having a relative with a malignant mole. Overall, the intra-observer reliability ranged from 55 to 81%, and was better for observers with more experience. The correlation between the interviewer counts and respondents' self-reported estimates was 0.41. The data on malignant moles in relatives suggest higher reporting rates in male cases and lower reporting in male controls relative to their female counterparts, but there is little difference by sex in the reporting of one's own nevus density.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2066743     DOI: 10.1016/0895-4356(91)90024-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  4 in total

1.  Accuracy of self-reported nevus and pigmentation phenotype compared with clinical assessment in a population-based study of young Australian adults.

Authors:  Anne E Cust; Kristen M Pickles; Chris Goumas; Thao Vu; Helen Schmid; Eduardo Nagore; John Kelly; Joanne F Aitken; Graham G Giles; John L Hopper; Mark A Jenkins; Graham J Mann
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 2.  Body Site Distribution of Acquired Melanocytic Naevi and Associated Characteristics in the General Population of Caucasian Adults: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Dilki Jayasinghe; Kaitlin L Nufer; Brigid Betz-Stablein; H Peter Soyer; Monika Janda
Journal:  Dermatol Ther (Heidelb)       Date:  2022-09-30

3.  A two-stage validation study for determining sensitivity and specificity.

Authors:  T D Tosteson; L Titus-Ernstoff; J A Baron; M R Karagas
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 9.031

4.  Comparability of naevus counts between and within examiners, and comparison with computer image analysis.

Authors:  J F Aitken; A Green; A Eldridge; L Green; J Pfitzner; D Battistutta; N G Martin
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 7.640

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.