Literature DB >> 7846994

Fine needle aspiration of the pancreas. In quest of accuracy.

D B Robins1, R L Katz, D B Evans, E N Atkinson, L Green.   

Abstract

Percutaneous fine needle aspiration (FNA) is the diagnostic method of choice for patients with a pancreatic mass. A positive cytologic diagnosis allows administration of neoadjuvant therapy in patients with resectable disease and avoids laparotomy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease. Ninety patients underwent computed tomographically guided FNA of the pancreas, and the results were compared to the final histologic diagnosis. The initial sensitivity for diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma was 70%. To improve our diagnostic accuracy, 19 independent cytologic criteria were evaluated for each case. Multivariate logistic-regression analysis identified three major criteria (nuclear crowding and overlapping, nuclear contour irregularity, irregular chromatin distribution) and four minor criteria (nuclear enlargement, single epithelial cells, necrosis, mitoses) as the most important predictors of malignancy. In the presence of two or more major or one major and three minor criteria, the sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma were 100%. Objective application of these criteria improved our diagnostic sensitivity to 90%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7846994

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Cytol        ISSN: 0001-5547            Impact factor:   2.319


  12 in total

1.  Impact of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy for diagnosis of pancreatic masses.

Authors:  Julio Iglesias-Garcia; Enrique Dominguez-Munoz; Antonio Lozano-Leon; Ihab Abdulkader; Jose Larino-Noia; Jose Antunez; Jeronimo Forteza
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-01-14       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Cytologic predictors of malignancy in bile duct brushings: a multi-reviewer analysis of 60 cases.

Authors:  Vaidehi Avadhani; Ezgi Hacihasanoglu; Bahar Memis; Burcin Pehlivanoglu; Krisztina Z Hanley; Uma Krishnamurti; Alyssa M Krasinskas; Adeboye O Osunkoya; Lauren M Daniels; Alexa A Freedman; Michael Goodman; Volkan Adsay; Michelle D Reid
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 7.842

3.  Molecular diagnosis of exocrine pancreatic cancer using a percutaneous technique.

Authors:  D B Evans; M L Frazier; C Charnsangavej; R L Katz; L Larry; J L Abbruzzese
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Cytology adds value to imaging studies for risk assessment of malignancy in pancreatic mucinous cysts.

Authors:  Muriel Genevay; Mari Mino-Kenudson; Kurt Yaeger; Ioannis T Konstantinidis; Cristina R Ferrone; Sarah Thayer; Carlos Fernandez-del Castillo; Dushyant Sahani; Brenna Bounds; David Forcione; William R Brugge; Martha Bishop Pitman
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Blinded prospective comparison of the performance of 22-gauge and 25-gauge needles in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of the pancreas and peri-pancreatic lesions.

Authors:  Jeffrey H Lee; John Stewart; William A Ross; Sharmila Anandasabapathy; Lianchun Xiao; Gregg Staerkel
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2009-08-11       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 6.  My approach to pancreatic fine needle aspiration.

Authors:  Gladwyn Leiman
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2006-05-12       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  p53 protein expression and CA19.9 values in differential cytological diagnosis of pancreatic cancer complicated with chronic pancreatitis and chronic pancreatitis.

Authors:  De-Qing Mu; Guo-Feng Wang; Shu-You Peng
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Predictive factors of malignant or invasive intraductal papillary-mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas.

Authors:  Yoshiaki Murakami; Kenichiro Uemura; Yasuo Hayashidani; Takeshi Sudo; Taijiro Sueda
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Evaluation of clinical relevance of examining K-ras, p16 and p53 mutations along with allelic losses at 9p and 18q in EUS-guided fine needle aspiration samples of patients with chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  C Salek; L Benesova; M Zavoral; V Nosek; L Kasperova; M Ryska; R Strnad; E Traboulsi; M Minarik
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-07-21       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Optimizing Diagnostic Yield for EUS-Guided Sampling of Solid Pancreatic Lesions: A Technical Review.

Authors:  Brian R Weston; Manoop S Bhutani
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2013-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.