Literature DB >> 7845766

Vection: the contributions of absolute and relative visual motion.

I P Howard1, A Howard.   

Abstract

Inspection of a visual scene rotating about the vertical body axis induces a compelling sense of self rotation, or circular vection. Circular vection is suppressed by stationary objects seen beyond the moving display but not by stationary objects in the foreground. We hypothesised that stationary objects in the foreground facilitate vection because they introduce a relative-motion signal into what would otherwise be an absolute-motion signal. Vection latency and magnitude were measured with a full-field moving display and with stationary objects of various sizes and at various positions in the visual field. The results confirmed the hypothesis. Vection latency was longer when there were no stationary objects in view than when stationary objects were in view. The effect of stationary objects was particularly evident at low stimulus velocities. At low velocities a small stationary point significantly increased vection magnitude in spite of the fact that, at higher stimulus velocities and with other stationary objects in view, fixation on a stationary point, if anything, reduced vection. Changing the position of the stationary objects in the field of view did not affect vection latencies or magnitudes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7845766     DOI: 10.1068/p230745

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  13 in total

1.  Optokinetic circular vection: a test of visual-vestibular conflict models of vection nascensy.

Authors:  R Jürgens; K Kliegl; J Kassubek; W Becker
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Perceiving a stable world during active rotational and translational head movements.

Authors:  P M Jaekl; M R Jenkin; Laurence R Harris
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-04-26       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Perceptual scaling of visual and inertial cues: effects of field of view, image size, depth cues, and degree of freedom.

Authors:  B J Correia Grácio; J E Bos; M M van Paassen; M Mulder
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Neural activity underlying the detection of an object movement by an observer during forward self-motion: Dynamic decoding and temporal evolution of directional cortical connectivity.

Authors:  N Kozhemiako; A S Nunes; A Samal; K D Rana; F J Calabro; M S Hämäläinen; S Khan; L M Vaina
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 11.685

5.  Effect of depth order on linear vection with optical flows.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Seya; Takayuki Tsuji; Hiroyuki Shinoda
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2014-12-01

6.  Comparing the effectiveness of different displays in enhancing illusions of self-movement (vection).

Authors:  Bernhard E Riecke; Jacqueline D Jordan
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-06-01

7.  Combined influence of visual scene and body tilt on arm pointing movements: gravity matters!

Authors:  Cécile Scotto Di Cesare; Fabrice R Sarlegna; Christophe Bourdin; Daniel R Mestre; Lionel Bringoux
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Single stimulus color can modulate vection.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Seya; Megumi Yamaguchi; Hiroyuki Shinoda
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-04-10

9.  Interaction between Depth Order and Density Affects Vection and Postural Sway.

Authors:  Astrid J A Lubeck; Jelte E Bos; John F Stins
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Relative Visual Oscillation Can Facilitate Visually Induced Self-Motion Perception.

Authors:  Shinji Nakamura; Stephen Palmisano; Juno Kim
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2016-08-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.