Literature DB >> 7845258

Formative assessment: a student perspective.

D A Hill1, A I Guinea, W H McCarthy.   

Abstract

An educator's view would be that formative assessment has an important role in the learning process. This study was carried out to obtain a student perspective of the place of formative assessment in the curriculum. Final-year medical students at Royal Prince Alfred Hospital took part in four teaching sessions, each structured to integrate teaching with assessment. Three assessment methods were used; the group objective structured clinical examination (G-OSCE), structured short answer (SSA) questions and a pre/post-test multiple choice questionnaire (MCQ). Teaching sessions were conducted on the subject areas of traumatology, the 'acute abdomen', arterial disorders and cancer. Fifty-five students, representing 83% of those who took part in the programme, responded to a questionnaire where they were asked to rate (on a 5-point Likert scale) their response to general questions about formative assessment and 13 specific questions concerning the comparative value of the three assessment modalities. Eighty-nine per cent of respondents felt that formative assessment should be incorporated into the teaching process. The SSA assessment was regarded as the preferred modality to reinforce previous teaching and test problem-solving skills. The MCQ was the least favoured assessment method. The effect size variable between the total scores for the SSA and MCQ was 0.64. The variable between G-OSCE and SSA/MCQ was 0.26 and 0.33 respectively. Formative assessment is a potentially powerful method to direct learning behaviour. Students should have input into the methods used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7845258     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1994.tb02550.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Educ        ISSN: 0308-0110            Impact factor:   6.251


  7 in total

Review 1.  The Advanced Trauma Life Support course: a history of its development and review of related literature.

Authors:  M R Carmont
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.401

2.  Improving in-training evaluation programs.

Authors:  J Turnbull; J Gray; J MacFadyen
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Using a Novel Student-centered Teaching Method to Improve Pharmacy Student Learning.

Authors:  Xin Meng; Lianrong Yang; Hui Sun; Xiaowei Du; Bingyou Yang; Hongwei Guo
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 2.047

4.  Teaching the trauma teachers: an international review of the Advanced Trauma Life Support Instructor Course.

Authors:  Darren A Kilroy
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.740

5.  Students as stakeholders in assessment: how students perceive the value of an assessment.

Authors:  Michelle Ricci; Christina St-Onge; Jing Xiao; Meredith Young
Journal:  Perspect Med Educ       Date:  2018-12

6.  Effect of Interactive Lectures and Formative Assessment on Learning of Epidemiology by Medical Undergraduates - A Mixed-Methods Evaluation.

Authors:  Vinayagamoorthy Venugopal; Amol R Dongre
Journal:  Indian J Community Med       Date:  2020-10-28

7.  Peers as OSCE assessors for junior medical students - a review of routine use: a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Simon Schwill; Johanna Fahrbach-Veeser; Andreas Moeltner; Christiane Eicher; Sonia Kurczyk; David Pfisterer; Joachim Szecsenyi; Svetla Loukanova
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 2.463

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.