Literature DB >> 7840985

Acoustic lability of albumin microspheres.

B F Vandenberg1, H E Melton.   

Abstract

The sonication of human serum albumin produces air-filled microspheres that are used in echocardiographic studies of myocardial perfusion. Recent studies suggest that the microspheres disappear when high pressures are applied, altering the relationship between the administered microsphere dose and the echocardiographic response. Because an ultrasound pulse generates a pressure wave in insonified medium, we hypothesized that with increasing acoustic pulse pressure, the microsphere concentration decreases, hence ultrasonic backscatter decreases. We measured relative integrated backscatter from albumin microspheres diluted in normal saline solution (6152 microspheres/ml) and 5% human plasma protein fraction (24,608 microspheres/ml), with increasing acoustic pulse pressures at the transducer's focus. Backscatter was also measured in normal saline solution with increasing concentrations (up to 15,380 microspheres/ml) of albumin microspheres at an acoustic pulse pressure of 0.11 MPa (1.1 atm). Backscatter and microsphere concentration were related logarithmically: y = 3.38 x 0.32; r = 0.93. Backscatter was unchanged over time at acoustic pulse (peak compression) pressures less than 0.15 MPa (1.5 atm). However, backscatter decreased readily at acoustic pulse pressures greater than 0.33 MPa (3.3 atm), which included any mixing effects. Thus, albumin microspheres are acoustically labile.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7840985     DOI: 10.1016/s0894-7317(14)80080-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr        ISSN: 0894-7317            Impact factor:   5.251


  7 in total

Review 1.  Section 8--clinical relevance. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 2.  Section 6--mechanical bioeffects in the presence of gas-carrier ultrasound contrast agents. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 3.  Section 7--discussion of the mechanical index and other exposure parameters. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 4.  Section 4--bioeffects in tissues with gas bodies. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.153

5.  Changes in myocardial blood volume over a wide range of coronary driving pressures: role of capillaries beyond the autoregulatory range.

Authors:  D E Le; A R Jayaweera; K Wei; M P Coggins; J R Lindner; S Kaul
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 6.  Contrast echocardiography 1996. A review.

Authors:  H R Villarraga; D A Foley; S L Mulvagh
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  1996

7.  Combined use of contrast-enhanced 2-dimensional and color Doppler echocardiography for improved left ventricular endocardial border delineation using Levovist, a new venous echocardiographic contrast agent.

Authors:  C Firschke; B Köberl; H von Bibra; J Horcher; A Schömig
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1997-04
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.