Literature DB >> 7837015

Artifacts in fusion and stereopsis testing based on red/green dichoptic image separation.

K Simons1, K Elhatton.   

Abstract

A red/green anaglyph stereotest (TNO) was administered to a group of patients who had anisometropic amblyopia, and the Worth 4-Dot test for fusion to two groups of strabismus patients. Both tests were administered twice, with the red/green lens position of the glasses reversed between eyes for the second administration. Twelve of 15 patients with anisometropic amblyopia exhibited a stereo acuity difference of 2:1 or more, and 18 of 89 strabismic patients changed Worth 4-Dot fusion or suppression status, between the two positions of the glasses. A group of seven strabismic patients who showed the reversal effect on the Worth 4-Dot test had the results of one glass' position discrepant with those of a geometrically identical achromatic test. It appears that the red/green format can introduce artifacts in binocular vision testing. Testing twice, with the red/green glasses reversed between trials, will prevent misinterpretation of binocular status and may provide diagnostically useful information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7837015     DOI: 10.3928/0191-3913-19940901-05

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus        ISSN: 0191-3913            Impact factor:   1.402


  5 in total

1.  Intraexaminer repeatability and agreement in stereoacuity measurements made in young adults.

Authors:  Beatriz Antona; Ana Barrio; Isabel Sanchez; Enrique Gonzalez; Guadalupe Gonzalez
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-04-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Natural history of amblyopia untreated owing to lack of compliance.

Authors:  K Simons; M Preslan
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Overestimation of stereo thresholds by the TNO stereotest is not due to global stereopsis.

Authors:  Kathleen Vancleef; Jenny C A Read; William Herbert; Nicola Goodship; Maeve Woodhouse; Ignacio Serrano-Pedraza
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2017-03-23       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Worth 4 Dot App for Determining Size and Depth of Suppression.

Authors:  Ann L Webber; Thomas R Mandall; Darcy T Molloy; Lucas J Lister; Eileen E Birch
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 3.283

5.  Does an iPad fixation disparity test give equivalent results to the Mallett near fixation disparity test?

Authors:  Ketan R Parmar; Christine Dickinson; Bruce J W Evans
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2019-09-07
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.