Literature DB >> 7835809

National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement. Ovarian cancer: screening, treatment, and follow-up.

.   

Abstract

The National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference on Ovarian Cancer-Screening, Treatment, and Follow-up brought together epidemiologists; obstetrician/gynecologists; gynecologic, medical, and radiation oncologists; and the public to address the following questions: (1) What is the current status of screening and prevention in ovarian cancer? (2) What is the appropriate management of early-stage ovarian cancer? (3) What is the appropriate management of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer? (4) What is the appropriate follow-up after primary therapy? and (5) What are the directions for future research? The consensus panel concluded that there is no evidence available as yet that the current screening modalities of CA 125 and transvaginal ultrasonography can be effectively used for widespread screening to reduce mortality from ovarian cancer nor that their use will result in decreased rather than increased morbidity and mortality. They recommended that further prospective research be done to evaluate this very important issue. Women with stage IA grade 1 and most IB grade 1 ovarian cancer do not require postoperative adjuvant therapy. Many remaining stage I patients do require chemotherapy. Subsets of stage I must be fully defined and ideal treatment must be determined. Women with stages II, III, and IV epithelial ovarian cancer (other than low malignant potential tumors) should receive postoperative chemotherapy. Physicians should be encouraged to discuss clinical trial participation with women, and women should be encouraged to participate. All women should have access to accurate and complete information regarding ovarian cancer. Furthermore, there must be no barriers to women's access to qualified specialists, optimal therapy, and protocols. The full text of the consensus panel's statement follows.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7835809     DOI: 10.1006/gyno.1994.1333

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  29 in total

1.  The value of abdominal CT scans in decision-making during chemotherapy in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  M A L van Lankveld; P H M Peeters; M A van Eijkeren; V C M Koot; P O Witteveen; W P Th M Mali
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.064

2.  Trends in treatment of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer in the Medicare population.

Authors:  Melissa M Thrall; Heidi J Gray; Rebecca Gaston Symons; Noel S Weiss; David R Flum; Barbara A Goff
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  [Clinical utility of serous tumoural markers].

Authors:  A Martín Suárez; L Alonso Díaz; I Ordiz Alvarez; J Vázquez; F Vizoso Piñeiro
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.137

4.  Comparison of a novel multiple marker assay vs the Risk of Malignancy Index for the prediction of epithelial ovarian cancer in patients with a pelvic mass.

Authors:  Richard G Moore; Moune Jabre-Raughley; Amy K Brown; Katina M Robison; M Craig Miller; W Jeffery Allard; Robert J Kurman; Robert C Bast; Steven J Skates
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 5.  The role of biomarkers in the management of epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Wei-Lei Yang; Zhen Lu; Robert C Bast
Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Diagn       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 5.225

6.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the Medicare cohort with advanced ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Melissa M Thrall; Heidi J Gray; Rebecca Gaston Symons; Noel S Weiss; David R Flum; Barbara A Goff
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 5.482

7.  Choice of management of southern Chinese BRCA mutation carriers.

Authors:  Ava Kwong; Connie H N Wong; Catherine Shea; Dacita T K Suen; Catherine L Y Choi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Feasibility of an ovarian cancer quality-of-life psychoeducational intervention.

Authors:  Shirley Otis-Green; Betty Ferrell; Virginia Sun; Maren Spolum; Robert Morgan; Deborah Macdonald
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.037

9.  The effect of neighborhood-level socioeconomic status on racial differences in ovarian cancer treatment in a population-based analysis in Chicago.

Authors:  Charlotte E Joslin; Katherine C Brewer; Faith G Davis; Kent Hoskins; Caryn E Peterson; Heather A Pauls
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 10.  Current state of biomarker development for clinical application in epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Richard G Moore; Shannon MacLaughlan; Robert C Bast
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2009-10-31       Impact factor: 5.482

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.