Literature DB >> 21496889

Trends in treatment of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer in the Medicare population.

Melissa M Thrall1, Heidi J Gray, Rebecca Gaston Symons, Noel S Weiss, David R Flum, Barbara A Goff.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Optimal care for most patients with advanced ovarian cancer generally includes both surgery and chemotherapy. Little is known about the proportion of women in the US who receive combination care or the sequence in which this care is delivered. This study evaluated patterns of care, frequency of completion of recommended therapy and factors associated with sequencing of therapy.
METHODS: Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End-Results data we identified a cohort of 8211 women aged 65 and above with stage III/IV epithelial ovarian cancer diagnosed between 1995 and 2005. Receipt of chemotherapy or surgery was identified using Medicare claims. Logistic regression was used to evaluate factors associated with sequencing of treatment and the receipt of surgery.
RESULTS: 3241 (39.1%) had surgery and at least 6 cycles of chemotherapy in either order. Surgery was performed initially in 4827 (58.8%) women and 3658/4827 (75.8%) had subsequent chemotherapy. 2017 (24.6%) had primary chemotherapy and 649/2017 (32.2%) of these women had subsequent surgery. Advanced age, African American race, stage IV disease, non-married status and increasing medical comorbidity were all associated with the failure to receive both surgery and at least 6 cycles of chemotherapy (all p<0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: The majority of women with advanced ovarian cancer in the Medicare population do not receive both combination therapy with surgery and at least 6 cycles of chemotherapy. A large proportion of women are receiving chemotherapy as primary treatment for advanced ovarian cancer, and the majority of these patients do not have cancer-directed surgery.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21496889      PMCID: PMC3104110          DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.03.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  25 in total

Review 1.  Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement.

Authors:  M D Cabana; C S Rand; N R Powe; A W Wu; M H Wilson; P A Abboud; H R Rubin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-10-20       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Overview of the SEER-Medicare data: content, research applications, and generalizability to the United States elderly population.

Authors:  Joan L Warren; Carrie N Klabunde; Deborah Schrag; Peter B Bach; Gerald F Riley
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

Authors:  M E Charlson; P Pompei; K L Ales; C R MacKenzie
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

4.  Regional variation in cancer-directed surgery and mortality among women with epithelial ovarian cancer in the Medicare population.

Authors:  Kathleen M Fairfield; F Lee Lucas; Craig C Earle; Laurie Small; Edward L Trimble; Joan L Warren
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Survival effect of maximal cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian carcinoma during the platinum era: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Robert E Bristow; Rafael S Tomacruz; Deborah K Armstrong; Edward L Trimble; F J Montz
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-03-01       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Use of SEER-Medicare data for measuring cancer surgery.

Authors:  Gregory S Cooper; Beth Virnig; Carrie N Klabunde; Nicola Schussler; Jean Freeman; Joan L Warren
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Utility of the SEER-Medicare data to identify chemotherapy use.

Authors:  Joan L Warren; Linda C Harlan; Angela Fahey; Beth A Virnig; Jean L Freeman; Carrie N Klabunde; Gregory S Cooper; Kevin B Knopf
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Assessing comorbidity using claims data: an overview.

Authors:  Carrie N Klabunde; Joan L Warren; Julie M Legler
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Age contrasts in clinical characteristics and pattern of care in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Ilan Bruchim; Marco Altaras; Ami Fishman
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.482

10.  Chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer: an overview of randomised clinical trials. Advanced Ovarian Cancer Trialists Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-10-12
View more
  22 in total

1.  Spatial analysis of adherence to treatment guidelines for advanced-stage ovarian cancer and the impact of race and socioeconomic status.

Authors:  Robert E Bristow; Jenny Chang; Argyrios Ziogas; Hoda Anton-Culver; Veronica M Vieira
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  Secondary Surgery Versus Chemotherapy for Recurrent Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Nina A Bickell; Natalia Egorova; Monica Prasad-Hayes; Rebeca Franco; Elizabeth A Howell; Juan Wisnivesky; Partha Deb
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 2.339

3.  Spatial analysis of advanced-stage ovarian cancer mortality in California.

Authors:  Robert E Bristow; Jenny Chang; Argyrios Ziogas; Daniel L Gillen; Lu Bai; Veronica M Vieira
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-01-31       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Cyclophosphamide and acrolein induced oxidative stress leading to deterioration of metaphase II mouse oocyte quality.

Authors:  Roohi Jeelani; Sana N Khan; Faten Shaeib; Hamid-Reza Kohan-Ghadr; Sarah R Aldhaheri; Tohid Najafi; Mili Thakur; Robert Morris; Husam M Abu-Soud
Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 7.376

5.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the Medicare cohort with advanced ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Melissa M Thrall; Heidi J Gray; Rebecca Gaston Symons; Noel S Weiss; David R Flum; Barbara A Goff
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 5.482

6.  Comparative effectiveness of upfront treatment strategies in elderly women with ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Jason D Wright; Cande V Ananth; Jennifer Tsui; Sherry A Glied; William M Burke; Yu-Shiang Lu; Alfred I Neugut; Thomas J Herzog; Dawn L Hershman
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Trends and factors associated with radical cytoreductive surgery in the United States: A case for centralized care.

Authors:  A K Sinno; X Li; R E Thompson; E J Tanner; K L Levinson; R L Stone; S M Temkin; A N Fader; D S Chi; K Long Roche
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 5.482

8.  Ovarian cancer in the United States: contemporary patterns of care associated with improved survival.

Authors:  William A Cliby; Matthew A Powell; Noor Al-Hammadi; Ling Chen; J Philip Miller; Phillip Y Roland; David G Mutch; Robert E Bristow
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 5.482

9.  Use and duration of chemotherapy and its impact on survival in early-stage ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Helen E Dinkelspiel; Ana I Tergas; Lilli A Zimmerman; William M Burke; June Y Hou; Ling Chen; Grace Hillyer; Alfred I Neugut; Dawn L Hershman; Jason D Wright
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 10.  Review of methodological challenges in comparing the effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus primary debulking surgery for advanced ovarian cancer in the United States.

Authors:  Ashley L Cole; Anna E Austin; Ryan P Hickson; Matthew S Dixon; Emma L Barber
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.