Literature DB >> 7827928

Economic evaluation of standard heparin and enoxaparin for prophylaxis against deep vein thrombosis in elective hip surgery.

M Drummond1, M Aristides, L Davies, C Forbes.   

Abstract

Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a common complication in patients undergoing elective hip surgery. Because of the associated risk of pulmonary embolism, prophylaxis with standard (unfractionated) heparin is becoming increasingly important. Recent clinical trials have shown a low molecular weight form of heparin, enoxaparin, to be more effective than standard heparin in preventing DVT, but the new drug is also more expensive. Data on clinical effectiveness and cost were combined in an economic evaluation of the two regimens. It was found that prophylaxis with enoxaparin would be expected to lead to a net saving of 20 pounds per patient. The economic results are sensitive to the costs of enoxaparin, the costs of drug administration and the probability of false clinical diagnosis of DVT or pulmonary embolism.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7827928     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800811212

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  14 in total

1.  Economic evaluation of enoxaparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in acutely ill medical patients.

Authors:  Robin Offord; Adam C Lloyd; Pippa Anderson; Andy Bearne
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2004-08

2.  Cost-effectiveness of extended prophylaxis with fondaparinux compared with low molecular weight heparin against venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing hip fracture surgery.

Authors:  Jonas Lundkvist; David Bergqvist; Bengt Jönsson
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2007-01-16

Review 3.  Formulary management of low molecular weight heparins.

Authors:  W E Wade; B C Martin; J A Kotzan; W J Spruill; M A Chisoholm; M Perri
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Enoxaparin. A pharmacoeconomic appraisal of its use in thromboembolic prophylaxis after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  C J Dunn; K L Goa
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 5.  Economics of thromboprophylaxis in total hip replacement surgery.

Authors:  J Harrison; D J Warwick; J Coast
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 6.  Cost effectiveness of the prevention and treatment of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  D R Anderson; B J O'Brien
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  Dermatan sulfate versus unfractionated heparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing surgery for cancer. A cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  E Attanasio; P Russo; G Carunchio; L Caprino
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.981

8.  Hospital-based costs associated with venous thromboembolism prophylaxis regimens.

Authors:  Geno Merli; Cheryl P Ferrufino; Jay Lin; Mohammed Hussein; David Battleman
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.300

9.  An economic evaluation of the costs and benefits of heparin rationalisation in a hospital pharmacy.

Authors:  Penny Reeves; Jonathan Cooke; Adam Lloyd; Adam Hutchings
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2004-06

Review 10.  Measuring the outcomes and pharmacoeconomic consequences of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in major orthopaedic surgery.

Authors:  Sean D Sullivan; Susan R Kahn; Bruce L Davidson; Lars Borris; Patrick Bossuyt; Gary Raskob
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.981

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.