Literature DB >> 15230364

An economic evaluation of the costs and benefits of heparin rationalisation in a hospital pharmacy.

Penny Reeves1, Jonathan Cooke, Adam Lloyd, Adam Hutchings.   

Abstract

AIM: To estimate the costs and benefits for a UK hospital pharmacy of stocking a single low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), enoxaparin, compared to stocking unfractionated heparin (UFH) and stocking both UFH and multiple different LMWHs.
METHODS: A decision-tree model was developed which considered the use of heparins for five indications: prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism (VTE) in major orthopaedic surgery; VTE prophylaxis in major general surgery; VTE prophylaxis in acute medical inpatients; treatment of diagnosed VTE; and anticoagulation for patients with unstable angina and non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (UA/NSTEMI). Previously published cost-effectiveness analyses for each indication were combined into a single model and updated to 2002 prices. The number of patients given heparin in each indication was estimated from the pharmacy records of a large UK teaching hospital. The model estimated the use of drugs, staff time, clinical events and resource use resulting from anti-coagulation. Costs were estimated from the perspective of the hospital and the UK National Health Service.
RESULTS: Total annual cost was estimated to be pounds sterling 3.2 m (single LMWH), pounds sterling 4.4 m (UFH only) and pounds sterling 3.7 m (multiple heparins). The largest expected cost savings from using a single LMWH compared to UFH only resulted from reduced hospital stay for DVT treatment, reduced revascularisation in UA/NSTEMI and fewer VTE events in orthopaedic surgery. Expected cost savings from using a single LMWH compared to multiple heparins were more modest
CONCLUSION: Sub-optimal choice of anticoagulants may result in substantial excess costs elsewhere in the hospital.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15230364     DOI: 10.1023/b:phar.0000026804.25975.be

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharm World Sci        ISSN: 0928-1231


  15 in total

Review 1.  Prevention of venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  W H Geerts; J A Heit; G P Clagett; G F Pineo; C W Colwell; F A Anderson; H B Wheeler
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  Meta-analysis of low molecular weight heparin in the prevention of venous thromboembolism in general surgery.

Authors:  P Mismetti; S Laporte; J Y Darmon; A Buchmüller; H Decousus
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Comparison of the cost of preventing postoperative deep vein thrombosis with either unfractionated or low molecular weight heparin.

Authors:  D Bergqvist; B Lindgren; T Mätzsch
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 6.939

4.  Prevention of venous thromboembolism in internal medicine with unfractionated or low-molecular-weight heparins: a meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials.

Authors:  P Mismetti; S Laporte-Simitsidis; B Tardy; M Cucherat; A Buchmüller; D Juillard-Delsart; H Decousus
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 5.249

5.  A comparison of enoxaparin with placebo for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in acutely ill medical patients. Prophylaxis in Medical Patients with Enoxaparin Study Group.

Authors:  M M Samama; A T Cohen; J Y Darmon; L Desjardins; A Eldor; C Janbon; A Leizorovicz; H Nguyen; C G Olsson; A G Turpie; N Weisslinger
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-09-09       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Assessment of the treatment effect of enoxaparin for unstable angina/non-Q-wave myocardial infarction. TIMI 11B-ESSENCE meta-analysis.

Authors:  E M Antman; M Cohen; D Radley; C McCabe; J Rush; J Premmereur; E Braunwald
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1999-10-12       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  The economic impact of treating deep vein thrombosis with low-molecular-weight heparin: outcome of therapy and health economy aspects.

Authors:  R D Hull; G F Pineo; G E Raskob
Journal:  Haemostasis       Date:  1998

8.  Economic evaluation of standard heparin and enoxaparin for prophylaxis against deep vein thrombosis in elective hip surgery.

Authors:  M Drummond; M Aristides; L Davies; C Forbes
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Economic evaluation of enoxaparin as postdischarge prophylaxis for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in elective hip surgery.

Authors:  L M Davies; G A Richardson; A T Cohen
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.725

10.  Prevention of postoperative venous thrombosis: a randomized trial comparing unfractionated heparin with low molecular weight heparin in patients undergoing total hip replacement.

Authors:  A Planes; N Vochelle; F Mazas; C Mansat; J Zucman; A Landais; J C Pascariello; D Weill; J Butel
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  1988-12-22       Impact factor: 5.249

View more
  2 in total

1.  Cost-Utility Analysis of Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis Strategies for People Undergoing Elective Total Hip and Total Knee Replacement Surgeries in the English National Health Service.

Authors:  Dalia M Dawoud; David Wonderling; Jessica Glen; Sedina Lewis; Xavier L Griffin; Beverley J Hunt; Gerard Stansby; Michael Reed; Nigel Rossiter; Jagjot Kaur Chahal; Carlos Sharpin; Peter Barry
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 5.810

2.  Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Two Different Enoxaparin Products in Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism Following Major Obstetric-gynecological Surgeries: An Open-label Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Manoochehr Abdolvand; Ashraf Aleyasin; Mohammad Reza Javadi; Mohammad Solduzian; Seyed Hossein Hosseini; Zohreh Ziaei; Samira Samira; Kheirollah Gholami
Journal:  Iran J Pharm Res       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 1.696

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.