Literature DB >> 7827649

Statistical analysis of cost outcomes in a randomized controlled clinical trial.

M P Rutten-van Mölken1, E K van Doorslaer, R C van Vliet.   

Abstract

This paper suggests an approach to deal with an estimation problem which is often encountered in analyzing the longitudinal cost data gathered in a clinical trial. The source of that estimation problem is twofold: 1) a considerable number of missing data due to treatment-related withdrawal of severely affected patients with high health care costs in only one the treatment groups and 2) a heavily skewed cost distribution due to rare high-cost events. The approach is illustrated using data from a trial comparing 3 different drug regimes. In order to calculate costs per patient-year in case of selectively missing data we extrapolated the costs of patients with incomplete follow-up. Due to the skewness and the associated large variance in costs per patient-year, these costs cannot be analyzed using common parametric statistical methods relying on underlying normal distributions. A logarithmic transformation was performed to approximate a normal distribution, reduce the impact of extreme values and create similar size variances in the treatment groups. An ordinary least squares regression analysis of transformed data then standardized for differences in patient characteristics between the groups. For the retransformation, the so-called smearing estimate was used. This 'transformation-standardization-retransformation' approach enabled us to provide more consistent and efficient estimates of cost differences that were shown to be statistically significant and judged to be important.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7827649     DOI: 10.1002/hec.4730030507

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Econ        ISSN: 1057-9230            Impact factor:   3.046


  21 in total

Review 1.  How should cost data in pragmatic randomised trials be analysed?

Authors:  S G Thompson; J A Barber
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-04-29

2.  Economic analysis of randomized, controlled trials.

Authors:  G H Lyman
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 3.  Common errors and controversies in pharmacoeconomic analyses.

Authors:  S Byford; S Palmer
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  A strategy for collecting pharmacoeconomic data during phase II/III clinical trials.

Authors:  J Mauskopf; K Schulman; L Bell; H Glick
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 5.  Statistical analysis in pharmacoeconomic studies. A review of current issues and standards.

Authors:  D Coyle
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Cost-of-illness studies based on massive data: a prevalence-based, top-down regression approach.

Authors:  Björn Stollenwerk; Thomas Welchowski; Matthias Vogl; Stephanie Stock
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2015-02-04

7.  Pan-European multicentre economic evaluation of recombinant urate oxidase (rasburicase) in prevention and treatment of hyperuricaemia and tumour lysis syndrome in haematological cancer patients.

Authors:  L Annemans; K Moeremans; M Lamotte; J Garcia Conde; H van den Berg; H Myint; R Pieters; A Uyttebroeck
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2003-02-04       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Clinical and economic outcomes of olanzapine compared with haloperidol for schizophrenia. Results from a randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  S H Hamilton; D A Revicki; E T Edgell; L A Genduso; G Tollefson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.981

9.  Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: outcomes comparison based on a large administrative database.

Authors:  Ulrich Guller; Sheleika Hervey; Harriett Purves; Lawrence H Muhlbaier; Eric D Peterson; Steve Eubanks; Ricardo Pietrobon
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Methods to analyse cost data of patients who withdraw in a clinical trial setting.

Authors:  Jan B Oostenbrink; Maiwenn J Al; Maureen P M H Rutten-van Mölken
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.981

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.