Literature DB >> 10160101

A strategy for collecting pharmacoeconomic data during phase II/III clinical trials.

J Mauskopf1, K Schulman, L Bell, H Glick.   

Abstract

This article presents an overview of the process and organisational aspects required to support the collection of pharmacoeconomic (PE) data during phase II and phase III clinical trials of pharmaceutical products. The process described requires early involvement of the PE study team in clinical trials design and planning, as well as continuing close collaboration between the PE study team and the clinical study team as the data collection plans are implemented. Adequate resources must be made available for staffing and funding the PE component of data collection and analysis. If the suggested procedures are adequately resourced and implemented, the result should be a comprehensive, complete and accurate database that will allow the PE study team to characterise the economic value of the new drug at the same time as the clinical study team characterise its safety and efficacy. Integrated clinical and economic evaluations are essential for the appropriate use of pharmaceutical products in rapidly changing markets.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 10160101     DOI: 10.2165/00019053-199609030-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  21 in total

1.  The integration of health quality of life in clinical research: experiences from cardiovascular clinical trials.

Authors:  E B Schron; S A Shumaker
Journal:  Prog Cardiovasc Nurs       Date:  1992 Jan-Mar

2.  The journal's policy on cost-effectiveness analyses.

Authors:  J P Kassirer; M Angell
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-09-08       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  The analysis of censored treatment cost data in economic evaluation.

Authors:  P Fenn; A McGuire; V Phillips; M Backhouse; D Jones
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Economic analysis of health care technology. A report on principles. Task Force on Principles for Economic Analysis of Health Care Technology.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1995-07-01       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Economic evaluation and quality of life assessments in cancer clinical trials: the CHART Trial.

Authors:  J Morris; M Goddard
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 9.162

6.  In search of power and significance: issues in the design and analysis of stochastic cost-effectiveness studies in health care.

Authors:  B J O'Brien; M F Drummond; R J Labelle; A Willan
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 7.  Valuation of medical resource units collected in health economic studies.

Authors:  C Copley-Merriman; T J Lair
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  1994 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.393

8.  The distinction between cost and charges.

Authors:  S A Finkler
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 9.  Methods for assessing relative importance in preference based outcome measures.

Authors:  R M Kaplan; D Feeny; D A Revicki
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Statistical analysis of cost outcomes in a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  M P Rutten-van Mölken; E K van Doorslaer; R C van Vliet
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  1994 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.046

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Economic evaluations during early (phase II) drug development: a role for clinical trial simulations?

Authors:  D A Hughes; T Walley
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Testing the validity of cost-effectiveness models.

Authors:  C McCabe; S Dixon
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  The problem of protocol driven costs in pharmacoeconomic analysis.

Authors:  D Coyle; K M Lee
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  The economic impact of Parkinson's disease. An estimation based on a 3-month prospective analysis.

Authors:  R C Dodel; M Singer; R Köhne-Volland; T Szucs; B Rathay; E Scholz; W H Oertel
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  The role of cost-consequence analysis in healthcare decision-making.

Authors:  J A Mauskopf; J E Paul; D M Grant; A Stergachis
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Unexpected yes- and no-answering behaviour in the discrete choice approach to elicit willingness to pay: a methodological comparison with payment cards.

Authors:  Thomas Hammerschmidt; Hans-Peter Zeitler; Reiner Leidl
Journal:  Int J Health Care Finance Econ       Date:  2003-09

7.  Costs of inflammatory bowel disease in Germany.

Authors:  Renee Stark; Hans-Helmut König; Reiner Leidl
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.981

8.  Feasibility of using administrative claims data for cost-effectiveness analysis of a clinical trial.

Authors:  Andre Konski; Mythreyi Bhargavan; Jean Owen; Rebecca Paulus; Jay Cooper; Karen K Fu; Kian Ang; Deborah Watkins-Bruner
Journal:  J Med Econ       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.448

9.  Cost effectiveness of omeprazole and ranitidine in intermittent treatment of symptomatic gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  N O Stålhammar; J Carlsson; R Peacock; S Müller-Lissner; M A Bigard; G B Porro; J Ponce; J Hosie; M Scott; D G Weir; C Fulton; K Gillon; K D Bardhan
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.981

10.  An Economic Analysis of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 94-10: Cost-Efficacy of Concurrent vs. Sequential Chemoradiotherapy.

Authors:  Andre Konski; Mytheryi Bhargavan; Jean Owen; Ritsuko Komaki; Corey J Langer; Elizabeth Gore; Rebecca Paulus; Hak Choy; Deborah-Watkins Bruner; Walter J Curran
Journal:  J Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-03-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.