Literature DB >> 10160478

Statistical analysis in pharmacoeconomic studies. A review of current issues and standards.

D Coyle1.   

Abstract

The increasing number of economic evaluations of healthcare interventions, and of drug therapies in particular, has been well documented. However, surveys have demonstrated that standards of conduct of such studies have not similarly increased. Of particular concern is the lack of development or even consideration of statistical techniques in the reporting of studies. This article addresses issues that must be considered both in the conduct and in the assessment of the quality of studies. Throughout the paper, examples of pharmacoeconomic analyses are used to illustrate the points made. Recommendations for the conduct of future pharmacoeconomic studies are given. Such recommendations specifically relate to the level of testing that is conducted, the choice of statistical tests and the manner in which statistical significance is reported. In addition, existing methods for the statistical analysis of cost-effectiveness ratios and for the determination of sample size in economic evaluations are discussed, and a partial solution to this issue is offered.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 10160478     DOI: 10.2165/00019053-199609060-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  30 in total

1.  Economic analysis of an immunosuppressive strategy in renal transplantation.

Authors:  T Schneider; F Fagnani; J L Lanoe; M Hourmant; J P Soulillou
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 2.  Statistical versus quantitative significance in the socioeconomic evaluation of medicines.

Authors:  B J O'Brien; M F Drummond
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  Methodological issues in economic assessments of new therapies. The case of colony-stimulating factors.

Authors:  M Drummond; J Menzin; G Oster
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Guidelines for pharmacoeconomic studies.

Authors:  W F McGhan; N J Lewis
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  1992 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.393

5.  Health care CBA/CEA: an update on the growth and composition of the literature.

Authors:  A Elixhauser; B R Luce; W R Taylor; J Reblando
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  In search of power and significance: issues in the design and analysis of stochastic cost-effectiveness studies in health care.

Authors:  B J O'Brien; M F Drummond; R J Labelle; A Willan
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Probabilistic sensitivity analysis using Monte Carlo simulation. A practical approach.

Authors:  P Doubilet; C B Begg; M C Weinstein; P Braun; B J McNeil
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 2.583

8.  The cost:benefit ratio of acute intervention for myocardial infarction: results of a prospective, matched pair analysis.

Authors:  A T Chapekis; K Burek; E J Topol
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.749

9.  Cost benefit analysis of early thrombolytic treatment with intracoronary streptokinase. Twelve month follow up report of the randomised multicentre trial conducted by the Interuniversity Cardiology Institute of The Netherlands.

Authors:  F Vermeer; M L Simoons; C de Zwaan; G A van Es; F W Verheugt; A van der Laarse; D C van Hoogenhuyze; A J Azar; F J van Dalen; J Lubsen
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1988-05

10.  A comparative trial of home and hospital psychiatric treatment: financial costs.

Authors:  F R Fenton; L Tessier; A P Contandriopoulos; H Nguyen; E L Struening
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 4.356

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  How should cost data in pragmatic randomised trials be analysed?

Authors:  S G Thompson; J A Barber
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-04-29

Review 2.  Inference for the cost-effectiveness acceptability curve and cost-effectiveness ratio.

Authors:  A O'Hagan; J W Stevens; J Montmartin
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  The use of the bootstrap statistical method for the pharmacoeconomic cost analysis of skewed data.

Authors:  A Desgagné; A M Castilloux; J F Angers; J LeLorier
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 4.  Common errors and controversies in pharmacoeconomic analyses.

Authors:  S Byford; S Palmer
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Use of confidence intervals in health economic studies.

Authors:  J A Sacristán
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 6.  Economic evaluations: a new avenue of outcome assessment in spinal disorders.

Authors:  Nicole van der Roer; Norbert Boos; Maurits W van Tulder
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Economic comparison of leflunomide and methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: an evaluation based on a 1-year randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Andreas Maetzel; Vibeke Strand; Peter Tugwell; George Wells; Claire Bombardier
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 8.  Analysis and interpretation of cost data in randomised controlled trials: review of published studies.

Authors:  J A Barber; S G Thompson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-10-31

9.  Using social media to deliver weight loss programming to young adults: Design and rationale for the Healthy Body Healthy U (HBHU) trial.

Authors:  Melissa A Napolitano; Jessica A Whiteley; Meghan N Mavredes; Jamie Faro; Loretta DiPietro; Laura L Hayman; Charles J Neighbors; Samuel Simmens
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2017-06-10       Impact factor: 2.226

10.  Using cost of infection as a tool to demonstrate a difference in prophylactic antibiotic efficacy: a prospective randomized comparison of the pharmacoeconomic effectiveness of ceftriaxone and cefotaxime prophylaxis in abdominal surgery.

Authors:  John C Woodfield; Andre M Van Rij; Ross A Pettigrew; Antje van der Linden; Donna Bolt
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.