Literature DB >> 7824244

The incidence of adhesions after prior laparotomy: a laparoscopic appraisal.

A I Brill1, F Nezhat, C H Nezhat, C Nezhat.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To relate the presence of intra-abdominal adhesions after laparotomy to the site of incision, repeat laparotomy, and the clinical indication for prior surgery.
METHODS: Three hundred sixty women undergoing operative laparoscopy after a previous laparotomy were assessed for adhesions between the abdominal wall and the underlying omentum and bowel. Complications resulting directly from these adhesions were documented.
RESULTS: Patients with prior midline incisions had significantly more adhesions (58 of 102) than those with Pfannenstiel incisions (70 of 258). Patients with midline incisions performed for gynecologic indications had significantly more adhesions (109 of 259) than all types of incisions performed for obstetric indications (12 of 55). The presence of adhesions in patients with previous obstetric surgery was not affected by the type of incision. Adhesions to the bowel were significantly more frequent after midline incisions above the umbilicus. Twenty-one women suffered direct injury to adherent omentum and bowel during the laparoscopic procedure.
CONCLUSIONS: Intra-abdominal adhesions between the abdominal scar and underlying viscera are a common consequence of laparotomy. Patients undergoing laparoscopy after a previous laparotomy should be considered at risk for the presence of adhesions between the old scar and the bowel and omentum.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7824244     DOI: 10.1016/0029-7844(94)00352-E

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  37 in total

1.  Direct visual or blind insertion of the primary trocar.

Authors:  S Jirecek; M Dräger; H Leitich; F Nagele; R Wenzl
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-01-09       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Current strategies and future perspectives for intraperitoneal adhesion prevention.

Authors:  Christoph Brochhausen; Volker H Schmitt; Constanze N E Planck; Taufiek K Rajab; David Hollemann; Christine Tapprich; Bernhard Krämer; Christian Wallwiener; Helmut Hierlemann; Rolf Zehbe; Heinrich Planck; C James Kirkpatrick
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Functional cine MR imaging for the detection and mapping of intraabdominal adhesions: method and surgical correlation.

Authors:  Sonja Buhmann-Kirchhoff; Reinhold Lang; Chlodwig Kirchhoff; Heinrich Otto Steitz; Karl Walter Jauch; Maximilian Reiser; Andreas Lienemann
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Minimally Invasive Reoperation following Laparotomy.

Authors:  Tracey D Arnell
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2006-11

5.  Laparoscopic entry: the modified alwis method and more.

Authors:  Thomas T Vellinga; Sarath De Alwis; Yoko Suzuki; Jon I Einarsson
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009

Review 6.  Postoperative adhesion development following cesarean and open intra-abdominal gynecological operations: a review.

Authors:  Awoniyi O Awonuga; Nicole M Fletcher; Ghassan M Saed; Michael P Diamond
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 3.060

Review 7.  The role of non-invasive imaging techniques in detecting intra-abdominal adhesions: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jonas Gerner-Rasmussen; Anders Meller Donatsky; Flemming Bjerrum
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 3.445

8.  Robotic natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) total colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis: a step-by-step video-guided technical note.

Authors:  T-C Chen; J-T Liang
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 3.781

9.  Feasibility and outcomes of laparoscopic renal intervention after prior open ipsilateral retroperitoneal surgery.

Authors:  Ronald S Boris; Gopal N Gupta; Jonas S Benson; W Marston Linehan; Peter A Pinto; Gennady Bratslavsky
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.942

10.  Impact of previous midline laparotomy on the outcomes of laparoscopic intestinal resections: a case-matched study.

Authors:  Erman Aytac; Luca Stocchi; Julie De Long; Meagan M Costedio; Emre Gorgun; Hermann Kessler; Feza H Remzi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.